Cell Grazing: Part III. Why More Pastures?

By Dr. Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume, President & CEO, Land & Livestock International, Inc.

So what is the actual advantage to a having a greater number of pastures? In one word, the advantage is control–especially control over time and stock density. The greater the number of pastures, the greater the amount of flexibility in dealing with the various stages of the carbohydrate storage cycle.

Move Overdue
Move Overdue


The “rule of thumb” essentially boils down to this: During periods of active growth (e.g. immediately following a rain during the growing season), shorten the grazed period (perhaps to only one day). This allows the animals to graze very selectively (even take nothing but seed heads if they desire) but not for long enough on each area to significantly defoliate the plants. Then, during periods of no growth, the grazed period can be lengthened to a period likely dictated by the nutritional needs of the livestock.

Also note that you should never become dogmatic about any sequence or order of movement. Always maintain the flexibility to achieve your goals without damage to the range. For example, if you have a poisonous plant problem in one pasture (paddock) during a certain time of the year, simply stay out of that paddock during that time of the year. I am aware of a good example to illustrate this point. One of this particular rancher’s pastures (paddocks) bordered a railroad track. He was afraid of fire caused by the train. Therefore, as soon as the forage was in good dormancy, he moved his herd into that area and kept them there until it was defoliated beyond danger.

Remember, it doesn’t hurt a perennial grass plant to defoliate it when it is dormant. However, there is one point of caution. As the plant is progressively defoliated, its nutritional quality diminishes and livestock condition becomes a concern. This drawback has been mitigated through supplementation programs. One approach that I have seen work well is keeping urea and molasses available free choice to the livestock. This has led to an interesting observation. By monitoring the daily consumption of molasses and urea one can readily tell when the livestock should be moved. As long as they are getting what they need on the range they will pretty much leave it alone. Then one day, all of a sudden, per head consumption will skyrocket. They are saying “it’s time to move on to fresh pasture.”

Furthermore, the greater the number of pastures, the better control you have over Stock Density. We pick up there with Part IV. Stock Density vs. Stocking Rate.

Source: Transcript of a Tape Recorded Session Made at Alan Savory and Stan Parson’s Rancher School. Albuquerque, NM. Spring 1982.

Dr Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume [send him mail] is President and CEO of Land & Livestock International, Inc

Copyright © 2013 by Land & Livestock International, Inc. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Cell Grazing and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Cell Grazing: Part III. Why More Pastures?

  1. Pingback: Cell Grazing: Part IV. Stock Density vs. Stocking Rate. | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  2. Dr. Jimmy,

    Yes, fast growth = fast moves.

    Chris Gill


  3. Pingback: Cell Grazing: Part V. How Many Animals? | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  4. Pingback: Cell Grazing: Part VI. Myths, Misconceptions, and Untruths about SGM | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  5. Pingback: Managed Grazing – Part 1 or 5 – Introduction to Managed Grazing. | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  6. Pingback: Managed Grazing – Part 2 of 5 – Animal Management | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  7. Pingback: Managed Grazing – Part 4 of 5 – Managing Pasture Plants | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  8. Pingback: What do animals eat when you start with largely bare land? | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  9. Pingback: Weeds as Quality Forage | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  10. Pingback: Maximizing Spring Green Up Without Destroying Summer Pastures | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  11. Pingback: Spraydipping cattle in central Africa | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

  12. Yes, of course. Use anything you wish. As old Ben Franklin once said, “We must all hang together, else we are sure to hang separately. lol


  13. I am genuinely delighted to glance at this web site posts which consists of lots of valuable data,
    thanks for providing such data.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s