The Case Against Genetics

by Dave Pratt at Ranching for Profit Blog

Moments ago I read the following in a popular industry magazine: “…given the multiple challenges you face that are beyond your control—drought, rising feed and fuel costs, escalating land values—genetic selection may be the single most important component of your operation that you control.”  If anyone out there believes that please explain it to me because I think genetics is WAY down the list of critical factors on which we as business owners need to focus.  This really isn’t a case against genetics. It is an argument for other things first.

What comes first? If you own a ranch and profit is one of your goals, start with the land, not the animals. Ranch land is worth a lot of money these days, but only a fraction of its value is tied to its potential for agricultural production. Capitalizing or concessionizing ranch resources may make a six or even seven figure difference to our bottom line.  It’s unlikely you’ll get that kind of return from evaluating EPD’s.

Next? Some places are better suited to growing stock than breeding stock.  Cow-calf enterprises on irrigated pasture usually aren’t as profitable as stocker or heifer development enterprises can be on that same forage.  It’d be a good idea to make sure we have the right enterprise mix before we get too worried about the genetic make-up of the animals in that enterprise.

And there’s more. Assuming a cow/calf enterprise is a good fit to our resource, let’s determine how it fits.  We’d be well served to make sure our production schedule matches the forage cycle.  In the Great Plains winter calving (February-April) might produce a big calf but usually requires winter feeding and all of the overhead costs that go along with that. Spring calving (May-June) may mean smaller calves, but often means less cost.  The type of animal ideally suited to winter calving is unlikely to be the same that is ideally suited for a low-cost summer program. Before we worry about breed and body type and start picking bulls and replacement heifers, wouldn’t it be best to know which production strategy produces the highest margin, the lowest overheads and provides the most protection from risk (severe winters, drought, etc.).

Since I brought it up, what about those heifers?  The decision to buy them or raise them ourselves can have as much or more impact on our profitability than the type of heifer we choose.  Furthermore, who ever said that replacements had to be heifers?  Some of your neighbors, particularly those with herds calving later than yours, might be well advised to buy your open and late calving cows as their replacements.  That avoids the cost and stress of calving out first calf heifers and the difficulty of getting them pregnant for the second time.    These are just some of the questions that often trump the economic impact of genetics.

This is not to say that genetics isn’t important.  I’d be naive if I didn’t recognize the value of having animals selected for and adapted to the environment and production schedule. But the article is wrong in suggesting that it is the “single most important” thing that you control.

Perhaps the thing that really set me off as I read the article is the way it portrayed us as victims.  It implied that we are victims of drought, rising feed and fuel costs and other externalities. I don’t mean to diminish the challenges we face when input costs rise faster than cattle prices or the economic and emotional toll we pay in drought; but the fact is that some of us weather the storm (or lack thereof) better than others. It’s true that none of us individually dictates the cost of feed or fuel, or can make it rain. But our choice of enterprises and the way we structure those enterprises has everything to do with our exposure to the risk of drought, our need for feed and fuel and just about any other external factor you can name.  Those decisions trump the economic impact of genetics.  It doesn’t matter what breed of cow you have or how good a bull you use if you ought not have cows!

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Land Values-Buying a Ranch, Managing the Ranch as a Business, Ranch Economics, Savory Grazing Method and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Case Against Genetics

  1. Dear.
    I agree with you
    First be efficient in producing pasture.
    At the lowest possible cost as much grass as possible.
    Research, read, seek advice. study.
    which is the best and what is the handling.
    the genetics does not appear


  2. John Herlihy says:

    I agree completely with the aspects presented. However, if a cowman follows his cattle through harvest, he will get grade outs. When he establishes a consistency in his cattle, he will recieve more for his cattle. Why do feed lots feed holstein cattle. They have been bred for desired genetics for so long they bring a consistent yield, feed conversion, rate of gain, etc. when they are in the feedlot. That means money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    • Most of our problems and misunderstandings can be trace to the failure of our education system (which very much includes the Cooperative Extension dis-Service).

      We go to range management class at the university where we are told that our goal should be to maximize the productivity of the land (up to the magical and mythical “maximum sustained yield” carrying capacity).

      Then we go across the hall to the animal science department and are told that our goal should be to maximize individual animal performance. “Consistent yield, feed conversion, rate of gain, etc. are “goods” that will get us a front row seat in heaven.

      The problem is that they are BOTH WRONG!

      For the commercial rancher trying to make a living, the goal is to maximize profits. Maximum profits are NEVER achieved at maximum sustained yield carrying capacity NOR at maximum animal performance.

      Maximum profits are achieved where Marginal Costs are equal to Marginal Revenue–i.e. where the cost of producing one pound of beef is exactly equal to the price we get for that pound of beef. (All of this is based upon the “law of diminishing returns” which is as real as the law of gravity.)

      An integral part of that is matching the type of cattle ran with the environment we are operating in. For example, where I live (in the Chihuahuan Desert, I have personally found profits to be maximized more often with what some folks call “junk cattle.” For example, one of the best sets of calves I have ever laid eyes on were in Mexico. They were on Mexican Corriente cows that had been exposed to a Brahman bull.

      Every day I live I wonder more and more what the hell anybody would want with a registered European breed cow. But it recently dawned on me that the answer was pretty simple — to breed her to a Brahman.


  3. Pingback: Food for Thought | Land & Livestock International, Inc.

Leave a Reply to Luis Mastropaolo Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s