Why? Why the difference?

via The American Lands Council

After more than a year of travelling the United States and educating thousands on the Transfer of Public Lands legislation, we never cease to be amazed at how many people just assume that the states have no right to their lands.  Likely, you have run across the same arguments.  Today, we’d like to share with you how you can open people’s minds to the facts in under 2 minutes.

All you need to do is show them a copy of the Federal Fault Line map, and ask the question, “Why?”  Ask them, “Why the difference?”  The answers don’t vary much.  The most common answer people generally give with  embarrassment is, “I don’t know.  I’ve never really thought about it.”  Well, people…it’s time get everyone to THINK about it.

If they have thought about it, the answers they give usually fit into one of two categories.  Either:

1)  Your lands are so arid/rugged…OR

2)  You gave up your lands.

Let’s take a look at these arguments one at a time.

  • “Your lands are arid/rugged.”It’s true that much of the west is lacking in moisture and die-hard Jeepers flock here to climb the biggest boulders.  AND????  Does that give the federal government the right to just keep it?  Does that excuse them from honoring our statehood agreements obligating them to dispose of our lands?  I don’t recall anything in our enabling acts that says, “the federal government shall dispose of the land in a timely manner…unless the land is dry…then just keep it.”  This more than 200-year-old obligation of Congress to “dispose of” the public lands goes far beyond simply selling the public lands if it is able. Homestead laws were just one of many means by which Congress disposed of the public lands, including granting public lands directly to the States as it did with Hawaii, Michigan and others.
  • “You gave up your lands.”This myth is refuted by the fact that states east of Colorado have the same unique “forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands” language in their enabling acts and yet they banded together and compelled Congress to transfer their public lands that it had delayed in disposing of for many decades. This myth is also dispelled by the fact that in 1932 Congress relented to the persistent demand of the public land States and convened hearings for the purpose of “Granting Remaining Unreserved Public Lands to States.” However, the bills most in consideration only proposed to transfer the surface rights to the States and not the minerals. The States flatly rejected this inequitable proposal that would violate the duty of Congress to dispose of all rights within the boundaries of each state not expressly reserved at statehood. As a result of the stalemate, Congress passed the Taylor Grazing Act in 1934 merely as a stopgap measure. As expressed in the very first line of the Act, it was passed “In order to promote the highest use of the public lands pending its final disposal.” In 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously declared that Congress does not have the authority by a subsequent, unilateral policy to alter or diminish “the uniquely sovereign character of [a state’s] admission” particularly where “virtually all of a State’s public lands are at stake.” (For a summary of the constitutionality of the TPLA, read here.)
There you have it:  In two minutes, you can help people question the false assertions they’ve heard over and over again, and help them be open to the truth.  And the truth is that these public lands were supposed to be disposed of a long time ago.  The Transfer of Public Lands is The Only Solution Big Enough to deal with the overwhelming challenges faced by our states today.
I urge you to take every opportunity this week to educate the people around you by simply showing them the Federal Fault Line map and asking the question, “Why?”  God bless you in your efforts.

(For more detailed information on this topic, and a copy of the information we prepared for Western Governor’s Association last week, click here.)

Sincerely,

Ken Ivory

ALC President

P.S. Click here to discover how you can stand with the American Lands Council, and help this work move forward.

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Government Interventionism, Private Property Rights on the "Public" Domain, Resources, Environment and Austrian Economics, Water, Wild Horses and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s