The Con-stitution and the power to confiscate

Nevertheless, it is hardly incorrect to say that before 1791, the time of ratification by the states, Americans owned property they had homesteaded. After ratification, not so much.

Isn’t it amazing how “naturalized” Americans (Ilana Mercer is an immigrant from S. Africa) always seem to know more about American history than do “natural born” Americans? There is a reason for that. Some still insist on calling them “public schools.” Personally, I prefer “mandatory government propaganda camps.” jtl, 419

Exclusive: Ilana Mercer drubs founders who made possible the ‘evil’ of eminent domain

Bolstered by the U S. Forest Service, authorities of Summit County, Colo., are scheming on seizing 10 acres of verdant land that belongs to Andy and Ceil Barrie.


The parcel of land is situated within the White River National Forest. The authorities claim the couple’s use of a motorized vehicle on the preserved land risks “damaging the alpine tundra and streams and the habitat of the endangered lynx.”

Since it is the nature of government to “turn a wormhole into a loophole,” the solution sought by the county’s commissioners and attorney general is to confiscate private property under the guise of “open-space” conservation.

On their side – and against the right of private property – the knaves of this Colorado county have a thing even more formidable than the U S. Forest Service: the U. S. Constitution.

Or, dare I say the Con-stitution?

Any discussion about the plight of the Barrie couple must be prefaced by noting the following:

There is no dispute as to the right of government grandees to grab private property.

What remains of some dispute is whether the county has exceeded its authority to steal. For the Constitution gives authorities the right to seize private property for the “common good” – that catch-all constitutional concept. Has not the General Welfare Clause, in Article I, authorized all three branches of colluding quislings to do just about anything which in their judgment will tend to provide for the general welfare?

The term for state-sanctioned theft of private property is “eminent domain.” A section of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Understand: Compensating the individual if and when government confiscates his land for the ostensible greater good – that is not what’s so wicked here. Rather, it is that implicit in the Bill-of-Rights clause mandating “just compensation” is the acknowledgment that government has the right to confiscate private property, in the first place.

Legal experts are agreed that when it comes to eminent domain, “The ambit of national powers is wide–ranging,” as the Legal Information Institute puts it:

“[Eminent domain] is a tacit recognition of a pre-existing power to take private property for public use, rather than a grant of new power.” Eminent domain “appertains to every independent government. It requires no constitutional recognition; it is an attribute of sovereignty.” …  the Court [has] affirmed that the power was as necessary to the existence of the National Government as it was to the existence of any State.

The Anti-Federalists forewarned early Americans of the “ropes and chains of consolidation,” inherent in the new, proposed Constitution.

Order lIana Mercer’s brilliant polemical work, “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa”

Eminent domain is one example of the slow and surreptitious leap from the freedom of a loose confederation of sovereign states – “a league of friendship” – to the “ropes and chains” of a unified state.

True too is that the Anti-Federalists gave us the Bill of Rights. Without their insistence on instantiating individual liberties in the Constitution, we’d be bereft of the protections afforded by the first 10 amendments appended to the U. S. Constitution.

Instead, property taken in “the pressing urgencies of government,” the words, circa 1787, of an anti-Federalist named “Federal Farmer” – would be removed willy-nilly and without compensation.

Thus, while the Anti-Federalists deserve our gratitude for forestalling a measure of tyranny, these unsung heroes of the American founding must not be blamed for the defensive clause in The Fifth, stipulating “the right to receive just compensation when the government takes private property for public use.”

The Anti-Federalists did not write the thing; Federalist James Madison was the one who introduced the amendments to the First United States Congress as a series of legislative articles.

Like a rattlesnake in winter hibernation, “the federal power of eminent domain lay dormant in the early years of the nation. It was not until 1876 that its existence was recognized by the Supreme Court.”

Nevertheless, it is hardly incorrect to say that before 1791, the time of ratification by the states, Americans owned property they had homesteaded. After ratification, not so much.

Ilana Mercer is a paleolibertarian writer, based in the U.S. She pens WND’s longest-standing, exclusive paleolibertarian column, “Return to Reason.” She is a fellow at the Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies, an award-winning, independent, nonprofit, free-market economic policy think-tank. Mercer’s latest book is “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons For America From Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Her website is She blogs at


Books by Dr. Jimmy T. (Gunny) LaBaume

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual by Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume.

This guide is a detailed book review of sorts, but perhaps it would be more accurately described as an abstract that condenses 864 pages of detail into 189 pages of concentrated information. No more excuses for failing to properly plan your grazing. The booklet is available from in both soft cover and Kendall versions. Click here. 

CoverA Handbook for Ranch Managers A Comprehensive Reference Manual for Managing the Working Ranch. Click here to buy the paperback version from Land & Livestock International’s Rancher Supply aStore.

Digital media products such as Kindle can only be purchased on Click Here to buy the Kendall Version on

To purchase an autographed copy of the book Click Here


Product DetailsCall for a pizza, a cop, and an ambulance and see which one arrives first.

So, who does that leave to protect you, your life, property and family?

The one and only answer is: YOU

This Handbook is intended to help you exercise that right and meet that responsibility.

Combat Shooter’s Handbook is available from in both paperback and Kindle versions.


The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsThe Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfits.  Click here to buy the paperback version from Land & Livestock International’s Rancher Supply aStore.

Digital media products such as Kindle can only be purchased on Click Here to buy the Kendall Version on

To purchase an autographed copy of the book Click Here

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Private Property Rights, Private Property Rights on the "Public" Domain, Public Domain, Public Lands, Radical Environmentalism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s