EPA Plans Will Cripple Rural Firefighting Crews

Be patient folks. The collapse is already underway. One day they will simply put their pencils down, turn off the lights and go home–just like they did in the old Soviet Union and for many of the same reason. What a glorious day that will be. — jtl, 419

by Amanda Radke in BEEF Daily

If the EPA has its way, rural firefighting crews will no longer be able to utilize retired Department of Defense vehicles to fight wildfires in a cost-effective manner. This could be a costly, and potentially deadly, decision for rural communities. What do you think?

It looks like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is at it again – and this time the agency’s actions could endanger the lives of rural Americans, their livelihoods, and the health of the environment. In a new agreement, the EPA wants to stop the Department of Defense (DOD) from allowing use of excess DOD vehicles by rural fire departments to fight wildland fires. I can only imagine how devastating this could be to some communities.

I have several family members who serve on volunteer firefighting crews during wildfire season, and the ability to respond quickly to these fires can spell the difference between saving or losing acres of trees, pastures and homes. Without these rural fire departments, these small communities will have to rely on larger urban firefighting crews, which likely means longer response times.

 According to the Oklahoma Farm News Update, “Through two long-standing federal excess property programs, Federal Excess Personal Property (FEPP) and Firefighter Property program (FPP), state forestry services across the country have been able to assist rural fire departments by providing no-cost military trucks that are then re-manufactured into wildland engines and water tenders through its Rural Fire Assistance Program. Without access to the vehicles and other equipment, many rural fire departments will find it difficult to operate, as commercial trucks are cost-prohibitive for most departments.”  

Not only will this limit how effectively rural firefighters can respond to wildfires, but it will be more costly for rural communities. Plus, it likely will mean more air pollution and particulates due to longer-burning fires and less efficient vehicles. I thought the EPA was all about reducing greenhouse emissions and working to reduce our carbon footprint? Or are they too busy writing ridiculous regulations aimed at putting ranchers out of business?

The Oklahoma Farm News Update also reports that local firefighting crews are the first on the scene for more than 75% of all wildfires. The loss of this kind of response could literally mean the difference between life and death in rural communities. However, EPA apparently feels it’s better to spend money on things like regulating dust in fields or mud puddles in my driveway.

You can read more about the proposal and how it will impact small communities here.

In my neighborhood this spring, rural firefighting-teams have twice responded to barn fires within miles of my house, with the larger units from town being the last to show up. In western South Dakota, rural firefighting teams are critical to protecting the Black Hills and the ranchers and rural residents who live in those areas. Without them, the results of wildfires could be deadly.

Even last year, when my parents burnt down an old barn, we relied on the assistance of local firefighters. Elective fires are part of the ranching business, too, and big city firefighting teams don’t have the time to assist in these burnings, either. This is just another example of how rural America will be impacted if this goes through.

What is the EPA thinking? How might this agreement impact your community? Are wildfires an issue in your area? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

The opinions of Amanda Radke are not necessarily those of Beefmagazine.com or the Penton Farm Progress Group. 

You might also like:

3 Tips For Handling And Storing Wet Hay

Specialists Provide Advice On Early Weaning Calves

60+ Stunning Photos That Showcase Ranch Work Ethics

15 ATVs and UTVs That Are New For 2014

How Much Is A Good Bull Worth?

Need a laugh? Enjoy New Cartoons From Dick Stubler

 

A Handbook for Ranch ManagersA Handbook for Ranch Managers.  In keeping with the “holistic” idea that the land, the livestock, the people and the money should be viewed as a single integrated whole: Part I deals with the management of the natural resources. Part II covers livestock production and Part III deals with the people and the money. Not only would this book make an excellent basic text for a university program in Ranch Management, no professional ranch manager’s reference bookshelf should be without it. It is a comprehensive reference manual for managing the working ranch. The information in the appendices and extensive bibliography alone is worth the price of the book.

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualPlanned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual. This is the ideal squeal to A Handbook for Ranch Managers.  Although the ecological principles remain the same, what was originally known as “The Savory Grazing Method” now answers to a multitude of different names: ranching for profit, holistic management, managed grazing, mob grazing, management intensive grazing, etc. Land & Livestock International, Inc. uses “Restoration Grazing” under its “Managing the Ranch as a Business” program.” No mater what you call it, this summary and synopsis will guide you step by step through the process and teach you how to use it as it was originally intended. No more excuses for failing to complete your grazing plans.

FOLLOW LAND & LIVESTOCK INTERNATIONAL ON FACEBOOK

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Radical Environmentalism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s