There has never been a documented case of Yellowstone bison transmitting the bovine disease brucellosis to domestic cattle… “Asking the right questions means making sure the right people with the right expertise and appropriate background are on the review panel.”
It is not a case of too many bison (or elk or aoudad or any other species). It is a case of too many government “scientists” and enviro-wacko journalists. But that sort of thing is perfectly predictable in a centrally planned socialistic society. — jtl, 419
by Todd Wilkinson via Jackson Hole News & Guide
Yellowstone’s chief scientist David Hallac was driving home to Mammoth from Bozeman, Montana, last Sunday when he encountered this sight at the southern edge of Paradise Valley well outside the national park: More than 100 wild elk feeding on hay in close quarters with domestic beef cows.
How ironic, he thought.
Only weeks from now, Montana, with tacit approval of the federal Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, will force Yellowstone to commence another bison killing season.
Perhaps 900 of the popular national park icons will be gunned down or shipped to slaughterhouses in what has become a bloody, contentious ritual.
There has never been a documented case of Yellowstone bison transmitting the bovine disease brucellosis to domestic cattle. Still, 7,800 bison have been killed since 1985 for heeding their ancient migratory instincts and leaving the park — the same as brucellosis-infected elk do — to go into Montana.
As Montana Gov. Steve Bullock and APHIS know, every single case of brucellosis transmission, wildlife-to-cattle, has come from infected wild wapiti.
The proliferation of brucellosis-infected elk is a chronic animal health issue in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. It is worsened by 22 Wyoming-operated elk feedgrounds and the National Elk Refuge in Jackson Hole and abetted by APHIS’s sister agency in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Forest Service, which allows some of its public lands in Wyoming to be used for controversial feedlots.
Recently APHIS, knowing the National Park Service wanted the National Academies of Science to conduct an extensive review of disease management protocols for wildlife and livestock in the tri-state region, beat it to the punch.
Montana wildlife advocate Kathryn QannaYahu does not believe APHIS made the pre-emptive request to resolve glaring inconsistencies and contradictions in its own policies relating to bison, elk, brucellosis, chronic wasting disease and cattle.
Instead, it’s an attempt by APHIS to obfuscate public scrutiny of its heavy-handed mandates resulting in needless slaughter of bison, its unachievable goal of brucellosis eradication, fear tactics it has applied to ranchers and the blind eye it has cast on the most troubling known reservoirs of disease — Wyoming’s 23 feedgrounds.
In 1998, the last time the National Academies reviewed brucellosis policies, Montana’s entrenched intolerance toward park bison, driven by APHIS, was deemed problematic and wasteful of millions of tax dollars.
Now 16 years later, more is known. Better forensic capabilities identified elk as being responsible for wildlife-to-cattle brucellosis transmissions.
Also known and acknowledged by wildlife and livestock officials in Wyoming is that Strain 19, a vaccine developed to protect cattle and reduce the prevalence of brucellosis in elk, has been ineffective.
Millions of additional tax dollars have been squandered operating Wyoming’s test and slaughter program with elk at the feedgrounds, affirming assertions that brucellosis persistence isn’t likely to be reduced until elk feedlots are shuttered.
The 1998 National Academies’ findings, critics say, were overly optimistic in suggesting an effective vaccine and a method of dispensing it to thousands of bison, tens of thousands of elk and other wildlife species that carry brucellosis and to hundreds of thousands of cattle was possible.
Experts today say eradication is impossible, as there exists no viable, cost-effective and publicly acceptable eradication scenario for brucellosis in wildlife. Nor is any in sight.
The National Academies’ new study comes at the same time federal and state agencies in Greater Yellowstone are rewriting the Interagency Bison Management Plan because the old plan is grossly out of date.
APHIS’s attempt to steer the National Academies’ scope of scientific inquiry caught even agencies in Wyoming and Idaho off guard.
“It’s vitally important that NAS probe and ask the right questions so that we are led to solutions rather than to more intractable conflict,” Yellowstone’s Hallac says. “Asking the right questions means making sure the right people with the right expertise and appropriate background are on the review panel.”
Critics say that if the NAS is tasked only with approaching brucellosis as a “wildlife problem” pinned on the backs of bison — and not considering the health of wildlife at an ecosystem level — then the region is doomed to repeat the same failed policies that harm not only wildlife but the public’s trust in government.
Columnist Todd Wilkinson has been writing about environmental issues for nearly 30 years.
A Handbook for Ranch Managers. In keeping with the “holistic” idea that the land, the livestock, the people and the money should be viewed as a single integrated whole: Part I deals with the management of the natural resources. Part II covers livestock production and Part III deals with the people and the money. Not only would this book make an excellent basic text for a university program in Ranch Management, no professional ranch manager’s reference bookshelf should be without it. It is a comprehensive reference manual for managing the working ranch. The information in the appendices and extensive bibliography alone is worth the price of the book.
Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual. This is the ideal squeal to A Handbook for Ranch Managers. Although the ecological principles remain the same, what was originally known as “The Savory Grazing Method” now answers to a multitude of different names: ranching for profit, holistic management, managed grazing, mob grazing, management intensive grazing, etc. Land & Livestock International, Inc. uses “Restoration Grazing” under its “Managing the Ranch as a Business” program.” No mater what you call it, this summary and synopsis will guide you step by step through the process and teach you how to use it as it was originally intended. No more excuses for failing to complete your grazing plans.