When Choice Matters: Organic Food vs. Organic Investing

Editorial By Anthony Wile via The Daily Bell

Morgan Stanley recently predicted a good deal of growth for organic/natural food sellers. In fact, this area is “hot.” And because it is, I want to clarify certain concerns regarding organic/natural food from an investment standpoint. Increasingly, we have an interest in this area.

But first, something from Morgan Stanley via Yahoo Finance:

A recent study by Morgan Stanley sheds some light on the prices consumers pay for groceries at several major store chains.

The study compared the cost of 100 commonly-purchased food items at different stores, focusing on organic/natural food sellers:

The Kroger Co (NYSE: KR), Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ: WFM), The Fresh Market Inc (NASDAQ: TFM) and Sprouts Farmers Market Inc (NASDAQ: SFM).

The study found that organic products command an average cost premium of 47 percent when compared to non-organic products within the same store. The organic premium was highest at Sprouts, where customers pay 57 percent more for organic products than non-organic products. The lowest organic premium was found at The Fresh Market (33 percent). …

The study also compared perceived quality and location convenience of the four stores to 11 other supermarkets. According to customers, Whole Foods has the highest perceived quality among Morgan Stanley’s four focus stores, trailing only Trader Joe’s Company overall. Kroger had the lowest perceived quality among Morgan Stanley’s picks. However, Kroger still handily beat the perceived quality of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT) and SUPERVALU INC.’s (NYSE: SVU) Save-A-Lot, which took the bottom two spots.

What do we learn? Already consumers are differentiating among sizeable providers. But how are they doing so? This is a very important point for both consumers and investors. Currently, definitions in the “organic/natural” arena are often muddled and abrupt.

As already stated in a recent editorial column, it will be increasingly important to clarify often-confusing terminology used in this area.

“Natural,” for instance, is an industry term that has little in the way of a formal government definition. “Organic,” on the other hand, is already significantly defined from a legal standpoint, though there are private definitions as well.

Professional investors seem to accept government definitions regarding organic food – no matter that they may include provisions that go beyond the actual food itself and what it contains. But eventually this could change.

As already reported, Whole Foods has begun moving beyond what is mandated in the government definition of “organic” with its own in-house standard. We wrote about that here:

Organic Trend Grows Despite Political Correctness

With the expansion of both public and private definitions, this will continue to be a confusing sector – at least for investors. In fact, for investors, confusing standards, especially in-house ones, may result in lost opportunities and deteriorating positions.

Morgan Stanley ,in its study, stated that it expects the “organic/natural food industry to continue to grow at a 9 percent annual rate.” It also over-weighted several providers like Whole Foods and Kroger.

This is encouraging news worth paying attention to. But in my view, Morgan Stanley ought to be even more predictive. As this sector matures there will be an increased number of definitions including such elements as “sustainability” of farming methods as well, of course, as the “carbon footprint.”

Will these prove important to consumers? Time will tell.

There are indeed numerous facets to consider. Over time, we’ll see what the consumer thinks – and winners and losers will begin to evolve. The Internet makes it more difficult to impose a one-size-fits-all government standard on a specific industry.

One scenario: At some point, consumers may at least in part turn more to locally grown produce and meat because these offer transparency and evident high-quality with less concern about non-essential impacts …

Or perhaps not. Perhaps these issues will prove MORE important to consumers. Predicting these trends will be an important part of investing in organic/natural foods and in building a successful business as well.

These are questions we’re considering as we perform our due diligence in this exciting and expanding area. If you’d like to be among the first to know our thoughts as well as our progress, send us an email at investorservices@thedailybell.com.

FOLLOW LAND & LIVESTOCK INTERNATIONAL ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

Check out our Online Rancher Supply Store

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)The Essence of Liberty Volume I: Liberty and History chronicles the rise and fall of the noble experiment with constitutionally limited government. It features the ideas and opinions of some of the world’s foremost contemporary constitutional scholars. This is history that you were not taught at the mandatory government propaganda camps otherwise known as “public schools.” You will gain a clear understanding of how America’s decline and decay is really nothing new and how it began almost immediately with the constitution. Available in both paperback and Kindle versions.

You might be interested in the other two volumes of this three volume setA: The Essence of Liberty Volume II: The Economics of Liberty and The Essence of Liberty Volume III: Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic. 

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Organic and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s