South Carolina knows that liberty cannot exist—therefore, life has no real meaning—without the right and control of property.

A Handbook for Ranch ManagersThere was a reason why South Carolina was the first to secede the last time around.

Hopefully, I will live to see it but little by little we will win this battle. Old Charlie Cong taught me a lot of things. One that sticks in my mind is a quote from Ho Chi Minh, “We are prepared to fight a thousand years.” – jtl, 419

AP Photo/Bruce Smith

AP Photo/Bruce Smith

by KEN IVORY via Breitbart News

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual“We in the East are tired of paying billions of dollars for the federal government to mismanage federally controlled lands in the West,” says South Carolina State Representative Alan Clemmons.

In 2013, the South Carolina Assembly passed a resolution “to express support to the western states of the United States of America and the federal transfer of public lands to the western states, and to urge the United States Congress to engage in good faith communication and cooperation to coordinate the transfer of title to the western States.” Representative Clemmons sponsored the resolution, which makes a persuasive economic, historical, and constitutional case for the federal government to honor the same statehood terms to western states regarding the transfer of public lands that it already kept with all states east of Colorado.Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian View

Western states are currently battling to secure control of the federal lands within their state borders, just like Illinois, Missouri, Louisiana, and their neighboring states did decades ago when the federal government controlled as much as 90% of their land.

The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsThe federal government still controls more than 65% of all lands within the borders of the state of Utah. In 2012, Utah initiated the battle for the transfer of federal lands with the passage of HB148, the Transfer of Public Lands Act (TPLA). Under TPLA, federal public lands become state public lands for multiple uses and sustainable economic yield with local planning and stewardship. The TPLA expressly excludes transfer of national parks, military bases, Indian reservations, and other heritage sites. The legislation also called on the federal government to work with Utah in good faith for the orderly transfer of all other federal lands by December 31, 2014. Not only did the federal government fail to cooperate by this date, it is currently seeking to bring even more land under its control.Combat Shooter's Handbook

Under increasing federal control over western lands, access is restricted, the health of the lands is diminished, and the productivity of the lands is depressed. Leading the charge in the movement to reverse this injustice is the American Lands Council (ALC), a non-profit organization of counties, cities, individuals, organizations, and businesses. The goal of the ALC is to secure better access, better health, and better productivity through the transfer of federal lands to willing western states for local control and stewardship.

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3) South Carolina’s resolution calls into question the federal government’s failure to treat western states on terms of equality with states east of Colorado. It points out that all newly created states east and west have the same statehood terms for the transfer of federal lands.

Why did a state 2,000 miles away choose to champion the cause of the western states? South Carolina knows the importance of local land management, responsible fiscal policy, and equal protection under the law. South Carolina knows that all states, from Maine to Arizona, will benefit from treating western states on terms of equality.

South Carolina knows it’s a double standard for the federal government to control more than 50% of all lands in western states (more than 80% in Nevada), but less than 5% on average of the lands east of Colorado. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the longstanding doctrine that “the constitutional equality of the states is essential to the harmonious operation of the … Republic” and that “our nation was, and is a union of states, equal in dignity, power and authority.” Does federal control over 50% of western states’ land seem “equal in dignity, power and authority”?

South Carolina knows that those whose lives and livelihoods depend upon the wise, long-term stewardship of their own lands and resources are apt to be better stewards than a deeply indebted federal government entrenched in conflicts around the globe. Distant, unelected, and unaccountable federal bureaucrats should not be controlling western states and their lands in the first place. When decisions regarding lands and resources are made by those closest to the matter, you get a better decision. Even the Canadian government understands this simple truth. It has been transferring control of its western lands to its provinces and territories over the last decade.

South Carolina knows that liberty cannot exist—therefore, life has no real meaning—without the right and control of property.

South Carolina knows that unreasonable federal policies result in devastating wildfires, which send millions of forested acres in the west up in smoke each year, killing millions of animals, and decimating watersheds and habitat for decades.

South Carolina knows that our national security technology, along with renewable energy and electronics technologies, cannot function without a stable supply of rare earth minerals. Currently, 95% of these rare earth minerals for our defense technology come from China, while an abundant supply of rare earth minerals are locked away in federally controlled western lands.

South Carolina knows there is more than $150 trillion dollars in mineral value locked up in federally controlled western lands, including more recoverable oil than the rest of the world combined. In a country with a spiraling debt of over $18 trillion dollars, the transfer of public lands to local control is the only solution big enough—not just for western states, but for the nation as a whole.

South Carolina knows that all it takes to halt environmental degradation and unleash stifled economic opportunity is for more eastern states, and Americans everywhere, to speak up for “the constitutional equality of the states [that] is essential to the harmonious operation of the [R]epublic.”

If your state knows what South Carolina knows, be a part of the only solution big enough.Sign the petition and encourage your state to join with South Carolina and pass a similar resolution to “urge the United States Congress to engage in good faith communication and cooperation to coordinate the transfer of title [of federal lands] to the western states.”

Ken Ivory is a Utah State Representative (District 47) and the president of the American Lands Council. The American Lands Council is leading the charge for the only solution big enough – the transfer of federal lands to willing western states for better access, better health and better productivity.  For more information or email


Check out our WebSite

Check out our Online Rancher Supply Store

A Handbook for Ranch ManagersA Handbook for Ranch Managers.  In keeping with the “holistic” idea that the land, the livestock, the people and the money should be viewed as a single integrated whole: Part I deals with the management of the natural resources. Part II covers livestock production and Part III deals with the people and the money. Not only would this book make an excellent basic text for a university program in Ranch Management, no professional ranch manager’s reference bookshelf should be without it. It is a comprehensive reference manual for managing the working ranch. The information in the appendices and extensive bibliography alone is worth the price of the book.

You might be interested in this books supplement: Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual.


About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Private Property and Free Markets, Private Property Rights, Private Property Rights on the "Public" Domain, Public Domain, Public Lands, Public Lands Ranching and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s