Why one Montana school is ditching Obama’s school lunch program

With an increasing number of students eating off campus as a result of unpopular school lunches, one Montana school gave up federal funding in order to create locally-sourced, healthy meals that students will actually eat.

A Handbook for Ranch Managers I love Montana and Montanans–independent bunch they are. Once back in “the day” I saw some graffiti on a highway over/under pass. It said, “Do something about the population problem. Commit suicide.” — jtl, 419

by in BEEF Daily

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual After years of schools having to comply with First Lady Michelle Obama’s school lunch programs, which severely restrict animal proteins and dairy foods, many schools are choosing to opt out and forgo federal funding in order to serve lunches that kids will actually eat.

With the reform of school lunches, parents shared their concerns that their students weren’t being offered enough protein to fuel their days. Even more troubling, for the students who qualify for free or reduced meals, the breakfast and lunch they eat at school are quite possibly the only nutritious, filling meals they get during the day. In fact, 72% of students participating in school lunch programs do so at a reduced or free rate as more affluent students are opting to eat off campus.

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewIt’s quite unfortunate that politics and misinformed ideals about food, the environment and sustainability have led to a situation where our nation’s students are the ones who are suffering.

For the 2015-16 school year, school board members at Montana’s Bozeman High School voted to opt out of the school lunch programs, resulting in a loss of $117,000 in federal funding. However after ending the previous school year $16,000 in the red because many students chose to eat off campus, the school had Combat Shooter's Handbook Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps Institute The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfitslittle choice but to try something different. The contrast between this school year and the previous one is night and day.

Victor Skinner for EAG News says the Bozeman school system now feeds 1,000 meals each day and has already taken in $54,000 in food sales — a 48% jump from the $37,000 in foods sold last year.

Photo Credit: USDA

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)Skinner writes, “Across the district, the food service program is $1,441 in the black so far for the 2015-16 school year. The food service budget ended last school year $16,000 in the red, which is unacceptable in a school district that relies on the program to be self-supporting, says Steve Johnson, deputy superintendent. And school food service workers told board members students are now getting high quality food from local sources, rather than pre-packaged meals promoted by the government.”

According to the article, approximately 55% of foods are made from scratch in the Bozeman school kitchens, which is a rare thing when most of the nation’s school lunch programs rely on pre-packaged food. In Bozeman, beef is purchased from a local rancher, and even the honey mustard is made from scratch, using 25 gallons of locally-raised honey in each batch.

I have no doubt that the reformed school lunch programs aim to provide nutritious food to fuel kids and fight childhood obesity; however, if the students aren’t eating the meals and the majority of the food ends up in the trash, we need to look at reducing sales of sugary snacks and syrupy sodas, and focus on serving rich, wholesome food like meat and dairy, along with fruits and vegetables to nourish our nation’s students. They deserve better, and I applaud the Bozeman school district for making the wise choice to serve higher-quality foods to its students.

The opinions of Amanda Radke are not necessarily those of beefmagazine.com or Penton Agriculture.

FOLLOW FLYOVER PRESS ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

Check out our e-Store

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualPlanned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual. This is the ideal squeal to A Handbook for Ranch Managers.  Although the ecological principles remain the same, what was originally known as “The Savory Grazing Method” now answers to a multitude of different names: ranching for profit, holistic management, managed grazing, mob grazing, management intensive grazing, etc. Land & Livestock International, Inc. uses “Restoration Grazing” under its “Managing the Ranch as a Business” program.” No mater what you call it, this summary and synopsis will guide you step by step through the process and teach you how to use it as it was originally intended. No more excuses for failing to complete your grazing plans.

Advertisements

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Food and Fiber Issues and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s