3 ways to disprove IARC on red meat & cancer link

Although IARC considered more than 800 studies to make this conclusion, I believe the committee purposely chose to ignore the large body of research submitted by the beef checkoff and independent scientists. This action is irresponsible at best and malicious at its worst as red meat is a nutrient-rich food that has been eaten and enjoyed for generations

A Handbook for Ranch ManagersIt is called “cherry picking.” Besides, what do we need with all these “studies?” Look in a mirror and smile at yourself. There is a reason God put those two sharp upper incisors in your head–to tear the flesh from the bones of another animal. They need to get over it. — jtl, 419

by in BEEF Daily

In light of the International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (IARC) announcement that red meat and processed meat causes cancer, here are pages of studies to prove IARC wrong.

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewOn Monday, October 26, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is the cancer agency of the World Health Organization, announced the results of an ongoing discussion about red meat’s role in a healthy diet. IARC’s conclusion? Red meat is “probably carcinogenic to humans.”

Combat Shooter's Handbook Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps Institute The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsIn its report, IARC states that a 50 gram portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%. For reference, 50 grams is about 1.75 ounces.

Read IARC’s complete report on the consumption of red meat and processed meats here.

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)Although IARC considered more than 800 studies to make this conclusion, I believe the committee purposely chose to ignore the large body of research submitted by the beef checkoff and independent scientists. This action is irresponsible at best and malicious at its worst as red meat is a nutrient-rich food that has been eaten and enjoyed for generations — from native tribes eating red meat on the frozen tundra, to pioneers who salted it and kept it year ’round as a source of food on the prairie, to modern-day families who want to confidently feed their children pot roast on a busy school night and not feel guilty about it.

To shed some light on IARC’s reach and influence, the organization has completed reviews of the cancer risk of 984 other substances over the past 50 years, and of those items, approximately 48% were reported to have cancer risk. The highest-risk items include air, sunlight, hair coloring and alcohol.

READ: Understanding the evidence on red meat and cancer

Cancer devastates families around the world, and as folks become increasingly desperate to find the cause and a cure, it’s easy to pinpoint culprits that may be the cause. However, a whole, natural food like beef that is an abundant source of nutrients like zinc, iron, protein, B vitamins, and more, in my humble opinion, hardly seems like the right culprit to point a finger at.

Without question, this announcement from IARC puts into question consumers’ confidence in beef. While we don’t yet know the market ramifications of this announcement, it’s obvious that the beef industry has some damage control to do.

READ: 5 resources that debunk the red meat & cancer link 

Here are three resources that address the red meat and cancer risk. Please share this information on social media to help reassure folks that red meat can be a part of a healthy, nourishing diet.

1. The Mediterranean diet is recognized for its reduction in chronic disease, including cancer.

According to beef checkoff research, “The average intake of fresh red meat in the U.S. is 44.2 g per day (WWEIA, 2011-2012). The average intake of processed (cured) meat is 27.8 g per day. Usual U.S. adult consumption of red and processed meat is within, and often lower, than that reported in observational studies of the Mediterranean-style dietary pattern, which is recognized for its reduction in chronic disease risk.”

Case Study: Mechanisms of Dietary BaP Exposure in Colorectal Cancer

2. Cancer epidemiologist Dominik Alexander, PhD, points out weak link between red meat and cancer.

Alexander’s independent research finds that, “Most summary associations between red meat and processed meat and cancer are weak in magnitude and not statistically significant. Many associations for red/processed meat and cancer from individual studies are null or inverse. The majority of associations from individual studies are not statistically significant. It’s nearly impossible to disentangle the independent effects of red meat from the complex human diet and lifestyle.”

Read: Red Meat and Cancer Meta-Analyses Review from Alexander

3. Reference pages of studies from the beef checkoff.

Dozens of research has been gathered into one place that examines red meat intake and any correlations to cancer. Check out these 16 pages of research to answer all of your questions about red meat and cancer.

The opinions of Amanda Radke are not necessarily those of beefmagazine.com or Penton Agriculture.


Check out our WebSite

Check out our e-Store

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualPlanned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual. This is the ideal squeal to A Handbook for Ranch Managers.  Although the ecological principles remain the same, what was originally known as “The Savory Grazing Method” now answers to a multitude of different names: ranching for profit, holistic management, managed grazing, mob grazing, management intensive grazing, etc. Land & Livestock International, Inc. uses “Restoration Grazing” under its “Managing the Ranch as a Business” program.” No mater what you call it, this summary and synopsis will guide you step by step through the process and teach you how to use it as it was originally intended. No more excuses for failing to complete your grazing plans.

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Food and Fiber Issues and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s