Report called neutral for CME live cattle futures
Chicago | Reuters — The number of cattle placed into U.S. feedlots last month declined four per cent from a year ago to their lowest level for October since the government began tabulating the data in 1996, a U.S. Department of Agriculture report showed on Friday.
October’s placement results nearly matched forecasts by analysts, who cited burdensome supplies of heavier animals that weighed on cattle prices and eroded profit for feedyards.
USDA’s data on Friday indicated the number of cattle placed on feed by weight class continued to decline year-over-year for all categories except that above 800 lbs.
Friday’s USDA report showed October placements at 2.281 million head, down four per cent from 2.368 million last year, and close to analysts’ average forecast of 2.273 million.
The government said the number of cattle sold to packers, or marketings, declined three per cent in October from a year ago, at 1.63 million head.
Other than the marketing outcome that was slightly larger than expected, the results were generally neutral across the board, said Allendale Inc. chief strategist, Rich Nelson.
“This makes four months in a row of placements lower than last year, insuring manageable supplies through the first-quarter slaughter period,” he said.
Jim Robb, director of the Colorado-based Livestock Marketing Information Center, said the continued trend of yearly increases in the 800-lb. category suggests an ongoing trend as the industry builds the overall cattle inventory.
“There is plenty of forage and increasing wheat pasture in most of the country to hold animals and to continue this pattern of placing heavier-weight cattle,” he said.
USDA’s generally neutral report should have little influence next week on Chicago Mercantile Exchange live cattle investors, who will likely focus on Friday’s prices for slaughter cattle and beef at wholesale, analysts said.
— Theopolis Waters reports on livestock futures for Reuters from Chicago.
A Handbook for Ranch Managers. In keeping with the “holistic” idea that the land, the livestock, the people and the money should be viewed as a single integrated whole: Part I deals with the management of the natural resources. Part II covers livestock production and Part III deals with the people and the money. Not only would this book make an excellent basic text for a university program in Ranch Management, no professional ranch manager’s reference bookshelf should be without it. It is a comprehensive reference manual for managing the working ranch. The information in the appendices and extensive bibliography alone is worth the price of the book.
You might also be interested in the supplement to this Handbook: Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual.