If you don’t have a drought plan, get one. In fact, you should have had one yesterday.
Drought planning is especially essential in the Desert Southwest.
You should always assume you are going into a drought because the odds are that you are. In the desert, annual rainfall is below average in more years than it is above average. In fact, the long term ratio is about 4 to 1. The problem is that there is no way of telling how the dice will fall–for example, it might be 4 good years in a row followed by 16 years of drought. — jtl, 419
“This El Niño and this blessing of moisture we’ve had over the High Plains for a while is not going to last. This El Niño will peak in about the next month or so. After it peaks, I think we’ll see it rapidly diminish in intensity and go back the other way.”
That’s Brian Bledsoe’s outlook. Bledsoe, a Colorado Springs meteorologist and ag weather consultant, gave his 2016 weather forecast to more than 700 cattle producers who attended the recent Range Beef Cow Symposium in Loveland, Colo.
And that outlook? If you don’t have a drought plan, get one.
“This El Niño should be history sometime in the spring,” Bledsoe says. “By late spring, I think it’s probably done. Which should be an indication that you should be very diligent and very plan oriented in how you’re going to use your moisture in the short term.”
However, that doesn’t mean an immediate return to drought. But Bledsoe, whose family ranches and farms in eastern Colorado, says now is the time to get ready. “I’m always thinking about drought, because to me, there’s no worse thing in agriculture from a business perspective that drought. It is the worst kind of weather phenomenon, in my opinion.”
And for ranchers in the High Plains and western U.S., drought is simply a fact of life. “If you’re a farmer or rancher in the western High Plains, you experience drought about 75% of the time,” Bledsoe says. “In the western High Plains, we experience dry spells almost every year. Depending on how long they last depends on how they impact us.”
Here’s Bledsoe’s long-term weather forecast:
December through February, the computer models think California could see some relief from the persistent drought that has gripped the region. There’s a drier signal for the northern tier of states, including the Pacific Northwest. “But the dry signal for most of the northern tier isn’t terrible. However, I’m pretty confident you’re not going to have much of a winter in the Dakotas.”
Since El Niño will still be in play, and an El Niño keeps the storm track more active the farther south you go, Bledsoe thinks a wetter pattern will continue through the early spring for the southern tier of states.
March through May, the West Coast stays pretty soggy, Bledsoe predicts. “Colorado, Nebraska, the western Dakotas…not bad. The model says we’ll have some moisture. However, the farther south you go, the better chances for better moisture you are going to have. The farther north you go, you may get shorted a little this winter and spring.”
June through August, the northern tier starts to get a little more moisture as El Niño weakens its hold on the storm track and it begins to migrate north. But looking at the Southwest gives Bledsoe cause for concern. “We see a little swath of brown from New Mexico, Arizona, creeping up into Southwest Colorado (during this period). That’s essentially how (the last drought) started several years ago. That’s why I’m saying, if you have good moisture now and into the spring, put it to efficient use.”
Remainder of 2016 – However, as we head into the last half of 2016, Bledsoe says things might change. “The thing I’m thinking about is La Niña will return, likely in the back half of 2016,” he says. “I don’t know the exact time frame, I just know it’s going to happen. That’s pretty much a certainty.”
And when the pattern flips from El Niño to La Niña, the U.S. gets dry. “That’s especially true south of I-80 and even more so once you get south of I-70,” he says.
That’s why he champions a drought plan. “For a younger farmer or rancher, under the age of 40, if you don’t have a drought plan, you better get one yesterday. And for you older guys, if you don’t have a drought plan and are thinking I might do this or might do that, there’s no ‘mights’ about it. If you ‘might,’ you will lose a lot of money.”
That’s because, in Bledsoe’s opinion, as high priced as cattle are, you can’t afford to take chances if you’re a grass farmer. “If you don’t have grass, are you going to have cattle on your place? Probably not,” he says. And those who have tried to feed their way out of a drought know how expensive that can be.
“If you have a drought plan that you can enact to a “T,” you will get through those times. You may not be as profitable as you’d like, but you won’t sell the herd or sell the ranch.”
Looking beyond 2016, Bledsoe says it wise to prepare for dry times. “For the High Plains, the wetter times we remember from the late 70s through the 90s, those times are over,” he says. “Our wetter times will be shorter and less frequent and our drier times will be longer and more frequent. So have a plan.”
Murray N. Rothbard was the father of what some call Radical Libertarianism or Anarcho-Capitalism which Hans-Hermann Hoppe described as “Rothbard’s unique contribution to the rediscovery of property and property rights as the common foundation of both economics and political philosophy, and the systematic reconstruction and conceptual integration of modern, marginalist economics and natural-law political philosophy into a unified moral science: libertarianism.”
This book applies the principles of this “unified moral science” to environmental and natural resource management issues.
The book started out life as an assigned reading list for a university level course entitled Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian View.
As I began to prepare to teach the course, I quickly saw that there was a plethora of textbooks suitable for universal level courses dealing with environmental and natural resource economics. The only problem was that they were all based in mainstream neo-classical (or Keynesian) theory. I could find no single collection of material comprising a comprehensive treatment of environmental and natural resource economics based on Austrian Economic Theory.
However, I was able to find a large number of essays, monographs, papers delivered at professional meetings and published from a multitude of sources. This book is the result. It is composed of a collection of research reports and essays by reputable scientists, economists, and legal experts as well as private property and free market activists.
The book is organized into seven parts: I. Environmentalism: The New State Religion; II. The New State Religion Debunked; III. Introduction to Environmental and Natural Resource Economics; IV. Interventionism: Law and Regulation; V. Pollution and Recycling; VI. Property Rights: Planning, Zoning and Eminent Domain; and VII. Free Market Conservation. It also includes an elaborate Bibliography, References and Recommended Reading section including an extensive Annotated Bibliography of related and works on the subject.
The intellectual level of the individual works ranges from quite scholarly to informed editorial opinion.