Farmers React to the Final Spending Bill

Farmers are concerned about what they consider overreach of the EPA in the Waters of the U.S. Rule.

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewAnd the world’s largest welfare recipient goes to the trough one more time. Maybe the EPA Waters of the uS rule will be what it takes to make them realize that they never should have got into bed with the FedGov in the first place. Echos of FDR and Dishonest Abe (who created the Land Grant University System). — jtl, 419

Farmers React to the Final Spending Bill
The spending bill passed late last night has a total cost of $1.1 trillion.

A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual Not every issue important to farmers got a seat on the bus yesterday. The continents of the omnibus spending bill completed last night supports a repeal of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), modifies the dietary guidelines, and allocates a significant amount of money to agriculture research and food safety. Great news, except the broad sweeping $1.1 trillion spending package lacks the riders that would prevent state GMO-labeling laws and block the EPA’s Waters of the U.S. Rule.

Combat Shooter's Handbook Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps Institute The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsIt’s Congress’ unwillingness to oppose the EPA rule that has farmers worried, and they expressed their frustration this morning to “AgriTalk” host Mike Adams. “It’s just a complete and utter disappointment,” said Jack Lavers, a farmer from California. “It is just a bunch of empty cash being thrown at a problem and it doesn’t fix anything.”

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)Farmers are concerned about what they consider overreach of the EPA in the Waters of the U.S. Rule. Despite a recent hand slap for public coercion via social media, the agency hasn’t faced much opposition from the Capitol about the new rule. Many agriculture groups lobbied to have a rider that would block the rule included in yesterday’s spending bill, but it didn’t make the cut.

“Here in the real world, we are going to be hammered down by the EPA from now on,” Lavers said. “God help us that we win it in the courts, because if we don’t we will be in serious trouble.”

With the lack of legislative action, the only way the rule can be overturned is through the courts.

“If the courts are the only solution to the problem, I guess that’s OK,” said Missouri farmer Mike John. He said a failed checks-and-balances system is how this issue came to be.

While it is clear most farmers are upset about the rule, Don Lamb from Indiana suggested farmers focus on what they can control — how they farm.

“I think in general right now, there are just so many things going on that we tend to get overwhelmed,” he said.  “There’s so much on the national scene that we can’t control. I think you need to get back to the attitude of ‘what can I control?’ I can control what I do right here. I can control how I raise crops and how I take care of water.”

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian View

edited by

Dr Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume

Is now available in both PAPERBACK and Kindle

BookCoverImageMurray N. Rothbard was the father of what some call Radical Libertarianism or Anarcho-Capitalism which Hans-Hermann Hoppe described as “Rothbard’s unique contribution to the rediscovery of property and property rights as the common foundation of both economics and political philosophy, and the systematic reconstruction and conceptual integration of modern, marginalist economics and natural-law political philosophy into a unified moral science: libertarianism.”

This book applies the principles of this “unified moral science” to environmental and natural resource management issues.

The book started out life as an assigned reading list for a university level course entitled Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian View.

As I began to prepare to teach the course, I quickly saw that there was a plethora of textbooks suitable for universal level courses dealing with environmental and natural resource economics. The only problem was that they were all based in mainstream neo-classical (or Keynesian) theory. I could find no single collection of material comprising a comprehensive treatment of environmental and natural resource economics based on Austrian Economic Theory.

However, I was able to find a large number of essays, monographs, papers delivered at professional meetings and published from a multitude of sources. This book is the result. It is composed of a collection of research reports and essays by reputable scientists, economists, and legal experts as well as private property and free market activists.

The book is organized into seven parts: I. Environmentalism: The New State Religion; II. The New State Religion Debunked; III. Introduction to Environmental and Natural Resource Economics; IV. Interventionism: Law and Regulation; V. Pollution and Recycling; VI. Property Rights: Planning, Zoning and Eminent Domain; and VII. Free Market Conservation. It also includes an elaborate Bibliography, References and Recommended Reading section including an extensive Annotated Bibliography of related and works on the subject.

The intellectual level of the individual works ranges from quite scholarly to informed editorial opinion.

FOLLOW LAND & LIVESTOCK INTERNATIONAL ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

Check out our Online Rancher Supply Store

Advertisements

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Government Interventionism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s