Will Idaho case lead to reining in of unaccountable federal agencies?

This will be a major step forward in the fight to hold agencies accountable to Congress and to the American people.
Glory be. It is high time that the 4th branch be brought to heel. — jtl, 419
By Kaycee Royer Attorney via the  Pacific Legal Foundation

Should federal executive branch agencies be accountable to Congress? For most people, the common-sense answer to that question is “yes.” Yet PLF attorneys regularly go head-to-head with government lawyers who seem to believe their agencies should be immune from such basic accountability.

Case in point: Today, PLF was in federal court in Idaho for oral argument in Tugaw Ranches, LLC v. U.S. Department of Interior. This case concerns the controversial federal land-use plans intended to protect the threatened sage grouse population. These plans threaten the livelihood of ranchers who have worked the land for decades; they have been the center of conflict since they were adopted in 2015.

Our clients, three brothers whose family ranch is impacted by the rules, challenged the rules because the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service failed to send the rules to Congress, as required by the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

In response, the government has asked the court to dismiss the case. The government argues that the court cannot review the agencies’ failure to send the sage grouse rules to Congress as required by the CRA. Instead, the government asserts that the courts have no business enforcing the statute.

But that argument goes against the strong presumption of judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act—a presumption that was reinforced earlier this week by the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which incidentally is PLF’s 11th High Court victory.

In considering the government’s request to dismiss the case, the court pointed out that the government’s position is that the agencies are a fourth branch of government that cannot be held responsible to the other three branches. Congress clearly intended to hold agencies responsible when it enacted the CRA, so the fact that the court appears open to questioning the government’s position may be an encouraging sign.

We’re hopeful the court will agree that courts should have the power to hold agencies responsible for failing to follow the clear demands of Congress. This will be a major step forward in the fight to hold agencies accountable to Congress and to the American people.

Kansas Natural Resource Coalition v. Department of Interior

A buffalo rancher by trade, Ken Klemm also uses his 4,000-acre ranch in Kansas for conservation efforts. In fact, Klemm works with the Kansas Natural Resource Coalition (KNRC) to implement a conservation plan for the lesser prairie chicken. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers such local collaboration for determining endangered listings under its 2003 rule called the Policy for Evaluating Conservation Efforts When Making Listing Decisions (PECE Rule). Unfortunately, the rule is not lawfully in effect because the Service never submitted the PECE Rule to Congress as required by the Congressional Review Act (CRA). On behalf of KNRC, PLF has filed a lawsuit demanding that the Service submit its rule to Congress so it can legally take effect and allow good conservation work to continue.

Read more

Buyer Assistance:

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is in a position to assist the buyer in purchasing ranches anywhere in the Western United States and Northern Mexico. Pre – purchase services include help with due diligence, estimates of carrying capacity and potential for improvement, cash flow projections, etc. Post purchase services include everything from part time consulting to complete turn-key management.

We are not licensed real estate brokers nor are we licensed appraisers. We work only for the buyer for a negotiated fee.

Contact us at info@landandlivestockinternational.com or through our web site at www.landandlivestockinternational.com

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Government Interventionism, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Will Idaho case lead to reining in of unaccountable federal agencies?

  1. Reblogged this on Flyover-Press.com and commented:

    Glory be. It is high time that the 4th branch be brought to heel. — jtl, 419


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s