Understanding the Second Amendment

In fact the founding documents have spoken clearly that our rights come from our creator, not the government.
The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsAnd now you know why they want to destroy our religion.
A semi-automatic weapon is not an assault weapon.  And even if it were it is not within the authority of the federal government to ban.  I did not say within the power to ban as all governments rule by force and they have the military/police power to do anything, even if it is unconstitutional.
Combat Shooter's Handbook  And now you know why we live in a police state.

… the states are not bound by the 2nd Amendment as it was originally intended…. after the civil war the federal government did something that has allowed them to turn the Constitution on its head… the 14th Amendment. … What happened in this clause was to change the federal government from a construct of the many states to having the states subordinate to the federal government…

Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps InstituteAnd now you know why I’m always saying, “America died the day General Lee walked out of that courthouse.” — jtl, 419

Michael Lemieux via News With Views

In light of the recent mass shootings, and the apparent ignorance of the majority of the “news” media and elected officials, I am moved to write a brief primer of the 2nd Amendment in order to spread some enlightenment.

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1) The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)  As has been born out in the writings of the founders and authors of the Constitution, their debates, and indeed the US Supreme court, the “Bill of Rights” are not now nor ever envisioned to be a grant of right to the American people.  In fact the founding documents have spoken clearly that our rights come from our creator, not the government.  In fact the preamble of the Bill of Rights was quite clear that the intent of adding these rights was to restrict the federal government from abuse, it states: “THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added…” (Bold added)

A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewIn US V. Cruikshank (92 US 542) the Supreme Court ruled that the application of the First and Second Amendments “was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens” and “has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,” respectively.  Again we see the intent, recognized by the founders and by law, that the Bill of Rights was only a restraint on the Federal government from acting in these areas.

The 2nd Amendment, with its statement of “shall not be infringed” means exactly that.  That the federal government does not have the authority to pass laws restricting the right of citizens in keeping and bearing arms.  However, as we have witnessed in recent history (post 1939), not have authority has no longer been a deterrence to its power to pass laws.

We now have, and to be honest for some time now, we have had the call to ban military styled weapons call “assault weapons.”  To be factual, none of the firearms sold today are assault weapons.  By definition an assault weapon has the capacity for automatic fire (which includes 3 round burst).  A semi-automatic weapon is not an assault weapon.  And even if it were it is not within the authority of the federal government to ban.  I did not say within the power to ban as all governments rule by force and they have the military/police power to do anything, even if it is unconstitutional.

In US V. Miller (307 US 74), a case of a man who crossed state lines with a sawed off shotgun and was arrested.  During trial the courts made the determination that the weapon was not covered by the 2nd Amendment stating: “we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.”  So, by the courts own admission; the only weapons which are guaranteed covered by the 2nd Amendment are those weapons used by the military, which would be by definition Assault Weapons.

Now as we have seen in some states, they have restricted many areas of the 2nd Amendment; and it is their authority to do so if it falls within the power established by the states constitution.  Obviously California and Massachusetts comes to mind.  And as we cited above in the Cruikshank case, the states are not bound by the 2nd Amendment as it was originally intended.

Why did I say as originally intended?  Because, after the civil war the federal government did something that has allowed them to turn the Constitution on its head.  This was, in my opinion, one of the most mis-appropriated amendments to the Constitution, the 14th Amendment.  In particular the 1st section which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”  (Emphasis added)

What happened in this clause was to change the federal government from a construct of the many states to having the states subordinate to the federal government.  It accomplished this by stating that all citizens are first citizens of the United States and secondarily to the state they reside.  Prior to this a citizen was known by the state they were a citizen of and not of the central government.   Historically this was done to protect the recently freed slaves and to overcome the Jim Crow laws that were put in place.  And though well intentioned the effect was far reaching as politicians came to understand how much power they actually gained by this amendment.

The bottom line is that constitutionally the federal government does not have the authority to ban firearms but it will always maintain that it has the power to do so.  And as we all know, power corrupts…

© 2019 Michael Lemieux – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Michael Lemieux: raven-1911@hotmail.com

Michael LeMieux was the first son born to Raymond Lemieux and Lana Robie in the small town of Midwest City, Oklahoma. His family hails from Newmarket New Hampshire along the shores of the Lamprey River just outside Portsmouth. Michael was one of seven children raised in a military family that moved around the world, and lived as a child in New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, Delaware, and Spain. At 17 he enlisted in the U.S. Army and served a tour in South Korea, rising quickly through the enlisted ranks and even served as an enlisted aide to then Major General Hank “the Gunfighter” Emerson who instilled in him the spark of patriotism. As the enlisted aide for General Emerson he had the opportunity to drive President Gerald Ford during his visit there in 1974. In 1980, having not yet seen enough of the world, he changed services to the U.S. Navy. As a sailor he traveled to many nations of the world participating in humanitarian missions that included the Philippines, Australia, Mauritius, Mogadishu Somalia in Africa, Karachi Pakistan, Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, and Scotland. His military travels have allowed him to live in places in Europe such as Spain, Scotland, Germany, and Italy. He also served combat tours in Kuwait and Afghanistan. The last eight years of his military career was as a paratrooper; working tactical military intelligence for the 19TH Special Forces group. He has written numerous intelligence reports and briefings and has presented his findings at all levels of the DOD from General Officers to Special Operations mission briefs. Mr. Lemieux was medically retired from the US Army due to injuries received in Afghanistan for which he was awarded the Purple Heart. He currently lives in Bellevue, Nebraska, with his wife, Robin and works as a defense contractor to the U.S. Government. He has a Bachelors degree in Computer Science from Weber State University and is an avid researcher of constitutional law and history.

FOLLOW FLYOVER PRESS ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsThe Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfits. Although woven around the experiences and adventures of one man, this is also the story of the people who lived during the period of time in American history that an entire generation was betrayed It is the story of the dramatically changing times in which this personal odyssey took place. It is the story of the betrayal of an entire generation of Americans and particularly the 40% (of the military aged males) of that generation that fought the Vietnam war.

About Land & Livestock Interntional, Inc.

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is a leading agribusiness management firm providing a complete line of services to the range livestock industry. We believe that private property is the foundation of America. Private property and free markets go hand in hand—without property there is no freedom. We also believe that free markets, not government intervention, hold the key to natural resource conservation and environmental preservation. No government bureaucrat can (or will) understand and treat the land with as much respect as its owner. The bureaucrat simply does not have the same motives as does the owner of a capital interest in the property. Our specialty is the working livestock ranch simply because there are so many very good reasons for owning such a property. We provide educational, management and consulting services with a focus on ecologically and financially sustainable land management that will enhance natural processes (water and mineral cycles, energy flow and community dynamics) while enhancing profits and steadily building wealth.
This entry was posted in Gun Control, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Understanding the Second Amendment

  1. Reblogged this on Flyover-Press.com and commented:

    Read this and you will understand why they want to destroy our religion, we live in a police state and America died the day General Lee walked out of that courthouse.” — jtl, 419

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s