What No One is Saying about the Epstein Scandal [VIDEO]

Once upon a time a long time ago in a far off land known as Brewster County, Texas, I took care of business matters for a man who became a life long friend. His name was Keesey Kimball.

One day we were sitting in the company office and the conversation, as it often does, turned to politics. I made the typical adolescent “brilliant” remark: “Aw, nothing like that could ever happen in America.”

I will never forget, Keesey looked me straight in the eye and said, “Boy, don’t be too sure about that.”

So to those of you who believe Epstein was not killed by the Clintons, Boy, don’t be too sure about that. jtl, 419

Flyover-Press.com

Yet, when millions of people’s energy is focused on one event, and it extends across all social media, I can’t help but wonder whether we are playing into their magic alchemy.
 Combat Shooter's Handbook  Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps InstituteThe Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfits Once upon a time a long time ago in a far off land known as Brewster County, Texas, I took care of business matters for a man who became a life long friend. His name was Keesey Kimball.

One day we were sitting in the company office and the conversation, as it often does, turned to politics. I made the typical adolescent A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualEnvironmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian View“brilliant” remark: “Aw, nothing like that could ever happen in America.”

I will never forget, Keesey looked me straight in the eye and said, “Boy, don’t be too sure about that.”

So to those of you who believe Epstein was not killed by the Clintons, Boy, don’t be too sure about…

View original post 539 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

UN To America: Open the Border, Kill More Babies

Ironically, considering the fact that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was an advocate of pseudo-scientific racial quackery known as eugenics, Shamdasani also claimed abortion bans are “inherently discriminatory” because they affect “minority” women and other “marginalized communities.” … It is true that black and Hispanic babies in America are far more likely to be brutally dismembered in abortions than European-descent children.

A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewThe implication here is that we can either kill them in the womb or we’ll have to kill them later.
I don’t subscribe to that because it is very much like our great wars (WWI and WWII) –there is no way to tell how many cures for cancer or trips into outer space might have fell face down in that French mud. And who is always the first over the top of the trench? The cream of the cream–the leadership. — jtl, 419
Written by  Alex Newman at The New American

Combat Shooter's Handbook Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps Institute The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsBehaving more and more like the global government it seeks to become, the United Nations has stepped up its attacks against America — especially the growing efforts to protect the Southern border and the lives of unborn children. Even under President Donald Trump, the UN has continued to bark orders at America as if the U.S. government were a mere administrative unit in what globalists describe as “the New World Order.”

In a recent pro-abortion screed, for example, a spokesman for the UN “human rights” apparatus said the global body was “very concerned” about state laws proliferating across the United States that regulate or restrict the killing of pre-born babies. Killing babies is a “human right,” at least according to the UN.

More recently, the leader of the UN’s “refugee” bureaucracy said the agency was “deeply concerned” about policy changes aimed at bringing the mass influx into the United States from Central America under control.

Just last month, a top UN “human rights” official praised the coalition of far-left extremists in Congress that includes Representative Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) as “fantastic.”

And just last week, a top UN official teamed up with the “fake news” propagandists at CNN to undermine the nuclear family, calling it a “fantasy” that must be attacked by government.

The implications of the globalist UN’s anti-American, anti-life, anti-family, and anti-freedom meddling are enormous. Congress and President Trump must put an end to it — or at least end U.S. taxpayer subsidies for the UN and its growing extremism.

In May, citing a law passed in Alabama aimed at punishing “doctors” who murder unborn children, as well as similar laws being passed in other states, the UN sprang boldly into action. But not to defend life. Instead, among other demands, a UN official publicly urged the U.S. government to intervene to ensure that babies could continue to be slaughtered with impunity across all 50 states.

“We are very concerned that several U.S. states have passed laws severely restricting access to safe abortion for women, including by imposing criminal penalties on the women themselves and on abortion service providers,” complained UN “human rights” spokesman Ravina Shamdasani in an interview with Reuters Television in Geneva.

Abortion bans, the UN official continued, would cause the market for abortions to go underground, which would end up “jeopardizing the life, health and safety of the women concerned.” Obviously, she expressed no so such concerns for the life, health, and safety of the babies concerned. But under the UN’s logic, assassinations of adults should be legalized too, to prevent the market from going underground and to ensure the safety of the assasins.

Ironically, considering the fact that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was an advocate of pseudo-scientific racial quackery known as eugenics, Shamdasani also claimed abortion bans are “inherently discriminatory” because they affect “minority” women and other “marginalized communities.”

It is true that black and Hispanic babies in America are far more likely to be brutally dismembered in abortions than European-descent children. But the macabre irony of Shamdasani’s grotesque comments went unmentioned by the pro-abortion establishment media, which treated the UN’s views as praiseworthy.

Apparently oblivious to America’s constitutional system of government limiting federal power and jurisdiction, the UN official went on to call for the U.S. government to intervene against states that are working to protect babies. “We are calling on the United States and all other countries to ensure that women have access to safe abortions,” she said. “At an absolute minimum, in cases of rape, incest and fetal anomaly, there needs to be safe access to abortions.” By “safe,” Shamdasani presumably did not mean for the children slated for destruction.

While Americans have traditionally understood that human beings have an inalienable God-given right to life, globalists in America and beyond have long been seeking to flip the concept of rights upside down. Indeed, the UN and leading Deep State globalists in America are working to define the slaughter of babies as a human right, and efforts to stop the killings as a violation of human rights.

For instance, the global-government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations, a key Deep State tentacle in America, has been a leading promoter of dismembering and murdering unborn babies without legal consequences. In a recent article, two CFR writers argued that killing pre-born children in the womb is a “human right,” thereby illustrating perfectly the disgusting farce that is the globalist vision of “human rights” for all to see.

“Access to safe abortion has been established as a human right by numerous international frameworks, the UN Human Rights Committee, and regional human rights courts, including the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights,” claimed the CFR abortion propagandists, Rachel Vogelstein and Rebecca Turkington.

Globalists seeking to undermine nation-states and self-government are busy working to define migration into the United States and Europe as a “human right,” too. And so, alongside pretending that killing babies is a “human right,” UN officials slammed U.S. authorities for trying to impose limits on massive immigration from Central America by abusing the asylum and refugee process.

“We understand that the U.S. asylum system is under significant strain. And we are ready to play a constructive role if needed in helping alleviate this strain,” said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi after policy changes announced by the Trump administration that would make it harder to abuse the asylum system. “But we are deeply concerned about this measure. It will put vulnerable families at risk. It will undermine efforts by countries across the region to devise the coherent, collective responses that are needed. This measure is severe and is not the best way forward.”

Of course, the UN has made clear that it intends to flood Western nations with migrants. And the objective has been stated clearly, too. Late UN migration czar Peter Sutherland, a former Goldman Sachs boss, expressed hope that governments would use mass migration to undermine the “illusion” of sovereignty and the “shibboleth” of unique, self-governing nations.

Meanwhile, Castro-loving UN “Human Rights” boss Michelle Bachelet, a socialist who defected to the mass-murdering communist regime in East Germany, praised the “squad” of fringe leftwing congresswomen famous for hating America and Trump. “I believe that those four women are fantastic,” she said, describing them as “bright” and celebrating their alleged courage to “to say what they think.” Then she rambled on with comments implying that Donald Trump was a racist madman.

Finally, in a screed published this week by the world’s most infamous purveyor of fake news (CNN), “UN Women” boss Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka demanded a range of policies designed to destroy the nuclear family. Among other demands, the fringe communist activist serving as UN under-secretary-general called for all nations to adopt no-fault divorce laws and redefine “marriage” to include homosexuals. She blasted the “fantasy” of the nuclear family, too.

The New American has for years been documenting the UN’s growing assault on America’s independence and the God-given rights of all Americans. These attacks include brazen efforts to destroy gun rights, free speech, due process, self-government, federalism, and much more. The UN’s vision of human rights for the world is exactly the opposite of the views held by America’s Founding Fathers that produced the greatest and freest nation in history — not to mention the moral code outlined in the Bible that is at the core of Western civilization. Enough is enough.

President Trump has already withdrawn from a growing array of UN bodies, including the disgraced and discredited UN “Human Rights” Council and UNESCO. However, the increasing extremism of the UN’s war against faith, family, freedom, and America will not stop unless and until the United States defunds and withdraws from the entire UN monster. A bill to do just that — H.R. 204, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act — is currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Americans must keep pressuring Congress to pass it. Trump could play a key role. But he needs to hear from you.

Photo: mizoula/iStock Editorial/Getty Images Plus

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American who covers a broad range of topics. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com or through Liberty Sentinel Media. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU or on Facebook.

Related articles:

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

Pro-life “Heartbeat” Bills Seek to Rein In Abortion Across U.S.

Castro-loving Socialist to Lead UN “Human Rights” Bureaucracy

Congressman Introduces Bill to Get the U.S. Out of the UN

U.S. Set to Withdraw from UN Human Rights Council

New UN Chief: Globalist, Socialist, Extremist

UN “Human Rights” Council Now Officially Controlled by Dictators

UN Women Pushes Global Abortion for “Sustainable Population”

U.S. Set to Withdraw from UN Human Rights Council

 

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1) The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3) 

FOLLOW FLYOVER PRESS ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsThe Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfits. Although woven around the experiences and adventures of one man, this is also the story of the people who lived during the period of time in American history that an entire generation was betrayed It is the story of the dramatically changing times in which this personal odyssey took place. It is the story of the betrayal of an entire generation of Americans and particularly the 40% (of the military aged males) of that generation that fought the Vietnam war.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Song for Today: Jack Greene – If God Can Forgive You So Can I

Options for Homeland Defense, Inc. (Protecting Liberty through Private Firearms Ownership)  

“Owning a handgun doesn’t make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician.” – Jeff Cooper

Call for a pizza, a cop, and an ambulance and see which one arrives first.

In Warren v. District of Columbia the court ruled, and the Supreme Court upheld, that “(T)he desire for condemnation cannot satisfy the need for a special relationship out of which a duty to specify persons arises.” Because the complaint did not allege a relationship “beyond that found in general police responses to crimes,” the court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim.

The bottom line is that your local police are not legally obligated to protect you, the average citizen. In addition to the Warren case, there are hundreds of court rulings which state that cops are not legally responsible for protecting individual citizens. For example, see Zelig v. County of Los Angeles.

The government can’t protect you as you saw on September 11, 2001 as well as during the Washington, DC area “sniper” rampage and the plethora of active shooter events that we have had since.

In fact, the government could very well be our greatest fear, due to its propensity to murder people because of their ideas (See Ruby Ridge, ID and Waco, TX).

A simple internet or youtube.com search of “the police state” or “police brutality” will reveal literally thousands of violent crimes (from assault to cold blooded murder) committed by the State’s costumed emissaries of officially sanctioned violence (aka The Police State) against harmless and innocent people.

So, who does that leave to protect you, your life, property and family? The one and only answer is: YOU It is your duty and personal responsibility to protect yourself and your loved ones.

This responsibility is a natural right given to us by God as human beings and guaranteed to us as individuals by the Constitution of the United States of America.

Options for Homeland Defense, Inc. offers professional weapons and tactics training that will make the difference. Instructed by experienced combat veterans—guys that have “been there and done that.” It offers private instruction at its privately owned range and mobile training teams are available. All interactions are confidential and discrete.

Contact: You can contact us via email at editor@flyover-press.com or through any of the contact or email links on our Web Site at www.flyover-press.com

Posted in Song for the Day, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Understanding the Second Amendment

In fact the founding documents have spoken clearly that our rights come from our creator, not the government.
The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsAnd now you know why they want to destroy our religion.
A semi-automatic weapon is not an assault weapon.  And even if it were it is not within the authority of the federal government to ban.  I did not say within the power to ban as all governments rule by force and they have the military/police power to do anything, even if it is unconstitutional.
Combat Shooter's Handbook  And now you know why we live in a police state.

… the states are not bound by the 2nd Amendment as it was originally intended…. after the civil war the federal government did something that has allowed them to turn the Constitution on its head… the 14th Amendment. … What happened in this clause was to change the federal government from a construct of the many states to having the states subordinate to the federal government…

Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps InstituteAnd now you know why I’m always saying, “America died the day General Lee walked out of that courthouse.” — jtl, 419

Michael Lemieux via News With Views

In light of the recent mass shootings, and the apparent ignorance of the majority of the “news” media and elected officials, I am moved to write a brief primer of the 2nd Amendment in order to spread some enlightenment.

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1) The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)  As has been born out in the writings of the founders and authors of the Constitution, their debates, and indeed the US Supreme court, the “Bill of Rights” are not now nor ever envisioned to be a grant of right to the American people.  In fact the founding documents have spoken clearly that our rights come from our creator, not the government.  In fact the preamble of the Bill of Rights was quite clear that the intent of adding these rights was to restrict the federal government from abuse, it states: “THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added…” (Bold added)

A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewIn US V. Cruikshank (92 US 542) the Supreme Court ruled that the application of the First and Second Amendments “was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens” and “has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,” respectively.  Again we see the intent, recognized by the founders and by law, that the Bill of Rights was only a restraint on the Federal government from acting in these areas.

The 2nd Amendment, with its statement of “shall not be infringed” means exactly that.  That the federal government does not have the authority to pass laws restricting the right of citizens in keeping and bearing arms.  However, as we have witnessed in recent history (post 1939), not have authority has no longer been a deterrence to its power to pass laws.

We now have, and to be honest for some time now, we have had the call to ban military styled weapons call “assault weapons.”  To be factual, none of the firearms sold today are assault weapons.  By definition an assault weapon has the capacity for automatic fire (which includes 3 round burst).  A semi-automatic weapon is not an assault weapon.  And even if it were it is not within the authority of the federal government to ban.  I did not say within the power to ban as all governments rule by force and they have the military/police power to do anything, even if it is unconstitutional.

In US V. Miller (307 US 74), a case of a man who crossed state lines with a sawed off shotgun and was arrested.  During trial the courts made the determination that the weapon was not covered by the 2nd Amendment stating: “we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.”  So, by the courts own admission; the only weapons which are guaranteed covered by the 2nd Amendment are those weapons used by the military, which would be by definition Assault Weapons.

Now as we have seen in some states, they have restricted many areas of the 2nd Amendment; and it is their authority to do so if it falls within the power established by the states constitution.  Obviously California and Massachusetts comes to mind.  And as we cited above in the Cruikshank case, the states are not bound by the 2nd Amendment as it was originally intended.

Why did I say as originally intended?  Because, after the civil war the federal government did something that has allowed them to turn the Constitution on its head.  This was, in my opinion, one of the most mis-appropriated amendments to the Constitution, the 14th Amendment.  In particular the 1st section which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”  (Emphasis added)

What happened in this clause was to change the federal government from a construct of the many states to having the states subordinate to the federal government.  It accomplished this by stating that all citizens are first citizens of the United States and secondarily to the state they reside.  Prior to this a citizen was known by the state they were a citizen of and not of the central government.   Historically this was done to protect the recently freed slaves and to overcome the Jim Crow laws that were put in place.  And though well intentioned the effect was far reaching as politicians came to understand how much power they actually gained by this amendment.

The bottom line is that constitutionally the federal government does not have the authority to ban firearms but it will always maintain that it has the power to do so.  And as we all know, power corrupts…

© 2019 Michael Lemieux – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Michael Lemieux: raven-1911@hotmail.com

Michael LeMieux was the first son born to Raymond Lemieux and Lana Robie in the small town of Midwest City, Oklahoma. His family hails from Newmarket New Hampshire along the shores of the Lamprey River just outside Portsmouth. Michael was one of seven children raised in a military family that moved around the world, and lived as a child in New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, Delaware, and Spain. At 17 he enlisted in the U.S. Army and served a tour in South Korea, rising quickly through the enlisted ranks and even served as an enlisted aide to then Major General Hank “the Gunfighter” Emerson who instilled in him the spark of patriotism. As the enlisted aide for General Emerson he had the opportunity to drive President Gerald Ford during his visit there in 1974. In 1980, having not yet seen enough of the world, he changed services to the U.S. Navy. As a sailor he traveled to many nations of the world participating in humanitarian missions that included the Philippines, Australia, Mauritius, Mogadishu Somalia in Africa, Karachi Pakistan, Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, and Scotland. His military travels have allowed him to live in places in Europe such as Spain, Scotland, Germany, and Italy. He also served combat tours in Kuwait and Afghanistan. The last eight years of his military career was as a paratrooper; working tactical military intelligence for the 19TH Special Forces group. He has written numerous intelligence reports and briefings and has presented his findings at all levels of the DOD from General Officers to Special Operations mission briefs. Mr. Lemieux was medically retired from the US Army due to injuries received in Afghanistan for which he was awarded the Purple Heart. He currently lives in Bellevue, Nebraska, with his wife, Robin and works as a defense contractor to the U.S. Government. He has a Bachelors degree in Computer Science from Weber State University and is an avid researcher of constitutional law and history.

FOLLOW FLYOVER PRESS ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsThe Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfits. Although woven around the experiences and adventures of one man, this is also the story of the people who lived during the period of time in American history that an entire generation was betrayed It is the story of the dramatically changing times in which this personal odyssey took place. It is the story of the betrayal of an entire generation of Americans and particularly the 40% (of the military aged males) of that generation that fought the Vietnam war.

Posted in Gun Control, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Song for Today: Lying Time Again by Mel Tillis

Buyer Assistance:

Land and Livestock International, Inc. is in a position to assist the buyer in purchasing ranches anywhere in the Western United States and Northern Mexico. Pre – purchase services include help with due diligence, estimates of carrying capacity and potential for improvement, cash flow projections, etc. Post purchase services include everything from part time consulting to complete turn-key management.

We are not licensed real estate brokers nor are we licensed appraisers. We work only for the buyer for a negotiated fee.

Contact us at info@landandlivestockinternational.com or through our web site at www.landandlivestockinternational.com 

Posted in Song for the Day, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

If the Plan Works Out–Ben Wade For President!

Out of everything your teachers (especially history, civics, and social studies teachers) told you, at least 95% of it was outright lies. Remember:

“We” are not the government. The government is not “us.” The government is nothing but a relatively small number of elite men (and a few mentally retarded women like Nancy Pelosi) that hold a regional monopoly on the use of force and violence (force is the threat of violence). It is a mafia-like organization whose sole purpose is to take wealth from the productive class and give it to their cronies in the military-industrial-congressional-and law enforcement cartels. They commit crimes on a massive scale and a daily basis that they would lock the rest of us in a steel cage for doing. — jtl, 419

Flyover-Press.com

…the FBI has become very concerned that “conspiracy theorists” might be influencing people not to accept the “authorized version” of national and historic events. One has to wonder what their plans are for those folks who refuse to accept the official government version of unfolding events… After all, a government always puts its “official” version of any event out there in the hopes that a gullible public will embrace it and look no further. To say that governments are corrupt and lie to their subjects would only be to state the very obvious…I wonder if the new purview of the FBI will be to make sure everyone believes those fabrications the government releases to us as “truth.”

Combat Shooter's HandbookReconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps InstituteThe Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsOut of everything your teachers (especially history, civics, and social studies teachers) told you, at least 95% of it was outright lies. Remember:

“We” are not the government. The government is not “us.”…

View original post 1,513 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Song for Today: Gene Watson ~ Let Me Be The First To Go (with Vince Gill )

That’s my prayer too. — jtl, 419

Options for Homeland Defense, Inc. (Protecting Liberty through Private Firearms Ownership)  

“Owning a handgun doesn’t make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician.” – Jeff Cooper

Call for a pizza, a cop, and an ambulance and see which one arrives first.

In Warren v. District of Columbia the court ruled, and the Supreme Court upheld, that “(T)he desire for condemnation cannot satisfy the need for a special relationship out of which a duty to specify persons arises.” Because the complaint did not allege a relationship “beyond that found in general police responses to crimes,” the court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim.

The bottom line is that your local police are not legally obligated to protect you, the average citizen. In addition to the Warren case, there are hundreds of court rulings which state that cops are not legally responsible for protecting individual citizens. For example, see Zelig v. County of Los Angeles.

The government can’t protect you as you saw on September 11, 2001 as well as during the Washington, DC area “sniper” rampage and the plethora of active shooter events that we have had since.

In fact, the government could very well be our greatest fear, due to its propensity to murder people because of their ideas (See Ruby Ridge, ID and Waco, TX).

A simple internet or youtube.com search of “the police state” or “police brutality” will reveal literally thousands of violent crimes (from assault to cold blooded murder) committed by the State’s costumed emissaries of officially sanctioned violence (aka The Police State) against harmless and innocent people.

So, who does that leave to protect you, your life, property and family? The one and only answer is: YOU It is your duty and personal responsibility to protect yourself and your loved ones.

This responsibility is a natural right given to us by God as human beings and guaranteed to us as individuals by the Constitution of the United States of America.

Options for Homeland Defense, Inc. offers professional weapons and tactics training that will make the difference. Instructed by experienced combat veterans—guys that have “been there and done that.” It offers private instruction at its privately owned range and mobile training teams are available. All interactions are confidential and discrete.

Contact: You can contact us via email at editor@flyover-press.com or through any of the contact or email links on our Web Site at www.flyover-press.com

Posted in Song for the Day, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

If it isn’t a conspiracy, it ought to be

It’s a two-fer — Suddenly disarmament and Internet censorship can be trolled out as “public safety” measures by kind-hearted rulers who care.

A Handbook for Ranch Managers Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewConspiracy theorists are teased about their “tin foil hats” etc. But, if you take a close look over the past 20-30 years, many (if not most) of their assertions have turned out to be as they predicted. — jtl, 419

by Smokey Briggs, owner – publisher of the Monahans News and the Pecos Enterprise. He can be reached at <smokey@pecos.net

Combat Shooter's Handbook Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps Institute The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsAn old friend of mine once said, “I’m not interested in conspiracies, but facts do get my attention.”

After perusing the limited facts available so far regarding the three terror attacks in the United States in the past week or so, my first thought was, “If I were the man behind the curtains plotting the downfall of the United States, and wanted to hamstring any ability to resist me, this swarm of terror attacks would definitely be part of my plan.”
From what I have read, we had a Islamic/foreign-extremist in California, a white supremacist-extremist in El Paso, and an Antifa/left-extremist in Ohio, who all went off within a couple of days of each other.

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)That is some interesting coincidence to me.

The obvious, maybe too obvious, target (if it were a conspiracy) would be to disarm the American people. People without arms are a lot less troublesome to unpopular governments than vice versa.

Let’s face it, no matter who wins the 2020 election, the winning government is not going to be very popular with about one-half of the population of these Dis-united States.

Throw in a national and world economy that appears to be on its last, debt-exhausted legs, mix in the culturally charged politics of the past decades or two, along with the ongoing push for a Socialist messiah, and you have a pretty fair recipe for some civil discord that could turn into a lot of folks with axes to grind looking for whoever they think might be in charge of creating the dumpster fire that is their country.

If I was that guy, I would want all those people as poorly armed as possible.

But any three shooters with any one extremist ideology would do if I were just trying to set the stage for a national push to disarm the peasants.

On the other hand, if you are an evil dude with aspirations to be the Overlord of the World, what is even more dangerous to your ambition than a bunch of Bible clinging morons with guns?

Ideas.

Weapons without ideas are useless. Ideas are the real danger.

The idea of America was born long before those first patriots stood on Lexington Green on April 19, 1775.

Those brave men transformed an idea into action, but the idea came first.

If you study the American Revolution, you find that Sam Adams plowed and tilled the field of rebellious ideas, and sewed the seeds of individual liberty and equality before the law, for all of 20 years prior to 1775.

Ideas.

It was Sam’s ideas that defeated the British Empire. Guns not backed with ideas are just silly pieces of iron and wood.

Hence, every tyrant and would-be tyrant strives to control the flow of ideas.

All governors know, deep down in their two-sizes-too-small hearts, that if any sizeable portion of those they govern simply starts ignoring them, much less revolts, their rule is over.

What if everyone suddenly just didn’t pay their taxes? No one.

The truth of the matter is that the people are perfectly capable of throwing off the  yoke of a tyrannical government at any moment — if they act with any small bit of coordination.

So, the idea that this should happen, or could happen, or the ability to communicate that it is going to happen tomorrow, must be suppressed if you plan to be an evil dictator for any length of time.

To suppress ideas you have to censor. You have to curtail free speech.

The best way to do that is subtly. People get all worked up if you create a Czar of Censorship and have him start arresting tin-foil-hat-wearing newspaper publishers and such for publishing Bad Think.

Better to own the newspaper yourself, or at least the guy writing it. That used to be pretty easy to do. Printing newspapers and broadcasting radio and television is an expensive thing to do, and that limits the number of outlets — limited outlets means you can probably control at least the big ones without too much trouble.

But the Internet — the Internet is as big a problem for would-be-tyrants today as Gutenberg’s moveable-type press was for kings of old.

For the record, Johannes Gutenberg invented the moveable-type press, which revolutionized printing, making books somewhat affordable for the first time ever. That press was the spark that became the Enlightenment and all that followed, including our own America.

But, since the birth of the Internet, controlling the flow of information has been a brand new nightmare — actually nearly impossible for the establishments.

All of a sudden, the idea of the “gate keeping” publisher died, and with it, the ability to control the flow of information.

All of a sudden every jack-leg in the world could communicate with almost all the rest of the world, instantaneously.

How do you control that?

That is problematic if you are a would-be dictator.

How do you institute a Czar of Internet Censorship without causing a revolution amongst the citizens who cut their teeth on the value of a “free press” and the importance of “free speech?”

You do it by convincing them that bad ideas must be suppressed, “For their safety.”

What better way than three coordinated attacks in a very short span of time, by three ideologically varied “extremists,” who used virtually the same tools to commit their crimes, and who all also shared their beliefs on the Internet.

First demand that “extremist” views must be banned, and when you get that, the world is your oyster, because you are the guy that gets to decide what is “extreme.”

Pretty soon, extreme means anybody that opposes you. Funny how that always works out.

It’s a two-fer — Suddenly disarmament and Internet censorship can be trolled out as “public safety” measures by kind-hearted rulers who care.

The New York Times published an editorial calling for such Internet censorship on Sunday, almost as if on cue.

There will be more to follow, you can be sure.

I know, I need to leave the tinfoil hat at home. But you have to admit, even though it certainly couldn’t be a conspiracy, it ought to be.

History is funny that way, sometimes.

FOLLOW LAND AND LIVESTOCK INTERNATIONAL, INC. ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualPlanned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual. This is the ideal squeal to A Handbook for Ranch Managers.  Although the ecological principles remain the same, what was originally known as “The Savory Grazing Method” now answers to a multitude of different names: ranching for profit, holistic management, managed grazing, mob grazing, management intensive grazing, etc. Land & Livestock International, Inc. uses “Restoration Grazing” under its “Managing the Ranch as a Business” program.” No mater what you call it, this summary and synopsis will guide you step by step through the process and teach you how to use it as it was originally intended. No more excuses for failing to complete your grazing plans.

 

Posted in Gun Control, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Slippery Slope To Tyranny–And Trump Seems To Be On It!

Judge Andrew Napolitano wrote on http://www.lewrockwell.com on August 8th that “The Supreme Court has twice ruled in the past 11 years that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual pre-political liberty. … the court has recognized  that the framers did not bestow this right upon us. Rather, they recognized its preexistence as an extension of our natural human right to self-defense and they forbade government–state and federal–from infringing upon it.” … This is something that people, especially Christian people, need to be aware of and sensitive to. Christians, especially Christian and Southern patriots are now under attack as never before in our lifetime, and I am afraid the days ahead will not be pleasant.
A Handbook for Ranch Managers I used to say that it is not a question of “if” but only a question of “when.” For the first time, I have this little queasy feeling in the pit of my stomach that has never been there before. 

I had a long talk with the Sheriff of Brewster County, Texas the other day. He doesn’t know what to make of it either. I would, however, suggest that you all corner your county Sheriff and find out what his intentions are. A County Commissioner resolution declaring your county a Sanctuary Second Amendment County should be a good start.
Lord help us. — jtl, 419

by Al Benson Jr. at revisedhistory.com

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual When Obama was in office the Second Amendment was under constant assault. The False Flag shootings were, so it seemed, happening every other week and Obama would have gutted the Second Amendment had he been able to get the votes in Congress.

Now it seems that, in the wake of these recent shootings, Congress is more than willing to give Obama what he wanted while he was in office, and it also seems that Donald Trump is willing to help them do that. We all thought the Second Amendment was safe, at least while Trump was in office. Guess we should have known better. For all his pro-Second Amendment rhetoric, Trump seems willing to start gnawing at the bones that will eventually render the Second Amendment null and void. All it took was a little pressure from the radical Leftists and he caved.

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewThere should be a lesson for us here. There ain’t too many of the folks in Washington you can really trust, no matter what they say. In fact you can probably count those you can really trust on the fingers of one hand (and maybe have a finger or two left over).

Judge Andrew Napolitano wrote on http://www.lewrockwell.com on August 8th that “The Supreme Court has twice ruled in the past 11 years that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual pre-political liberty. That is the highest category of liberty recognized in the law. It is akin to the freedoms of thought, speech, and personality. That means that the court has recognized  that the framers did not bestow this right upon us. Rather, they recognized its preexistence as an extension of our natural human right to self-defense and they forbade government–state and federal–from infringing upon it.”

Combat Shooter's Handbook Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps Institute The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other Misfits In regard to Red Flag laws, Judge Napolitano noted: “The president also offered his support for “red flag” laws. These horrific statutes permit police or courts to seize guns from those deemed dangerous. Red flag laws are unconstitutional…In America we do not punish a person or deprive anyone of liberty on the basis of a fear of what the person might do. When the Soviets used psychiatric testimony to predict criminal behavior, President Ronald Reagan condemned it. Now the president wants it here.” Apparently what was once good for the Communists is now good for us. These is a lesson for us there, too. Maybe we need to wake up and smell the coffee!

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2)  The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3)     There was also an article on LewRockwell for 8/9, by Adam Palmer, and he noted, quite accurately, the following: “For those that believe Red Flag laws are ‘reasonable’ it is important to know that, once given power, those who receive it never give it back. Even more so, they use the power they have gained to eliminate any opposition to their rule. If Red Flag laws are put in place today, the “red flags” may be threatening language.  Tomorrow, they may be racism. Next week they may be political disagreements. In a month they may be any arguments at all. Next month, who knows? The goal posts are always moving…In a system of tyranny, the definition of dissent is always changing. And “…the people who are reporting your posts and pages on Facebook today will be the same people reporting  you to the police tomorrow.”

This is something that people, especially Christian people, need to be aware of and sensitive to. Christians, especially Christian and Southern patriots are now under attack as never before in our lifetime, and I am afraid the days ahead will not be pleasant.

FOLLOW LAND & LIVESTOCK INTERNATIONAL, INC ON FACEBOOK

Check out our WebSite

A Handbook for Ranch ManagersA Handbook for Ranch Managers.  In keeping with the “holistic” idea that the land, the livestock, the people and the money should be viewed as a single integrated whole: Part I deals with the management of the natural resources. Part II covers livestock production and Part III deals with the people and the money. Not only would this book make an excellent basic text for a university program in Ranch Management, no professional ranch manager’s reference bookshelf should be without it. It is a comprehensive reference manual for managing the working ranch. The information in the appendices and extensive bibliography alone is worth the price of the book.

You might also be interested in the supplement to this Handbook: Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference Manual.

Posted in Gun Control, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Song for Today: Hank Thompson -Three Times Seven

I know quite a few of those 3 X 21s — the old 3 X 7s have seen better days. — jtl, 419

The philosophy of the author (as well as the publisher) is that ranch management should be approached from the view that the land, the livestock, the people and the money are one—a single integrated whole. But once that is understood and constantly kept in mind, a close examination of each of these elements is permissible. Furthermore, due to the linear limitations of the written word, each of these management areas has to be treated separately. In keeping with that, Part I deals with the management of the natural resources. Part II covers livestock production and Part III deals with the people and the money. The book is a comprehensive source of information on all aspects of managing the working ranch. Not only would it make an excellent basic text for a university program in Ranch Management, no professional ranch manager’s reference bookshelf should be without it because it is a comprehensive reference manual for managing the working ranch. The information in the appendices alone is worth the price of the book. Read More. 

Planned Grazing: A Study Guide and Reference ManualFrom the Editor: I first attended Alan Savory and Stan Parson’s “Rancher School” in Albuquerque, NM in the early 1980s. Since that time, and throughout my academic career, I have advocated, taught and practiced the principles of the “Savory Grazing Method (or SGM)” as it was called in those days. Only a short time after I completed the school, Alan and Stan decided to dissolve their partnership and go their separate ways. Alan founded Holistic Management International and Stan the Ranching for Profit School. SGM (now Holistic Management) is a “method” and “methods” cannot be patented. As a result, the names the principles are presented under have proliferated. Although the fundamental ecological principles have not changed since those early days, we now have managed grazing, planned grazing, mob grazing, management intensive grazing, and perhaps a half-dozen others. (In fact, for some small degree of distinction, we choose to call what we do “Managing the Ranch…Read More

Environmental & Natural Resource Economics: The Austrian ViewMurray N. Rothbard was the father of what some call Radical Libertarianism or Anarcho-Capitalism which Hans-Hermann Hoppe described as “Rothbard’s unique contribution to the rediscovery of property and property rights as the common foundation of both economics and political philosophy, and the systematic reconstruction and conceptual integration of modern, marginalist economics and natural-law political philosophy into a unified moral science: libertarianism.” This book applies the principles of this “unified moral science” to environmental and natural resource management issues. The book started out life as an assigned reading list for a university level course entitled Environmental…Read More

The Betrayed: On Warriors, Cowboys and Other MisfitsSometimes people do the wrong things for the right reasons. The author admits that to be the “story of his life” and openly shares much of it in this book. Although the book is largely an historically based auto-biography, it is part fact and part fiction. In cases where identities needed to be protected, the “facts” necessary to that end are changed but without altering the accuracy of the description of the event or its historical significance. It is a personal story. It is a cowboy-warrior’s story told in a cowboy-warrior’s language. It is the story of one man’s journey from bondage to freedom and from slavery to liberty. It is the gritty story of this man’s life-long education in the school of hard knocks as his journey took him from a sharecropper’s shack, through the rodeo arena and the boxing ring, across the football field and the drilling rig floor, into the Marines and two wars and ultimately culminating in the university… Read More 

Combat Shooter's Handbook“Owning a handgun doesn’t make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician.” – Jeff Cooper Call for a pizza, a cop, and an ambulance and see which one arrives first. In Warren v. District of Columbia the court ruled, and the Supreme Court upheld, that “(T)he desire for condemnation cannot satisfy the need for a special relationship out of which a duty to specify persons arises.” Because the complaint did not allege a relationship “beyond that found in general police responses to crimes,” the court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim. The bottom line is that your local police are not legally obligated to protect you, the average citizen. In addition to the Warren case, there are hundreds of court rulings which state that cops are not legally responsible for protecting individual citizens. For example, see Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, The government can’t protect you as you saw on September 11, 2001 as well as during the Washington, DC… Read More

Reconnaissance Marine MCI 03.32f: Marine Corps InstituteAll unclassified Army and Marine Cops manuals and correspondence courses are products of the US Federal Government. They are NOT subject to copyright and can be freely copied and redistributed. The Marine Corps Institute (MCI) develops correspondence courses for Marines with all kinds of Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) on all manner of subjects. This is one of those courses. The print is relatively small because that is the way it was in the original and this is an exact reproduction. Also, as a tribute to the individual (and a touch of reality), you will notice that the editorial pencil marks and underlined passages that were put there by the Marine that took this course. They were intentionally left in the reproduction. This version of the course was authorized in September of 1984. With the exception the development of Infrared technology, it contains information and techniques that have changed very little since the Vietnam war. These battle proven tactics are as valid today as they were… Read More

The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government (Liberty and ... Limited Government) (Volume 1)The Essence of Liberty: Volume I: Liberty and History: The Rise and Fall of the Noble Experiment with Constitutionally Limited Government. Jimmy T LaBaume, editor.  Read More 

The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2)The Essence of Liberty: Volume II: The Economics of Liberty (Volume 2) Read More

The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3) by Dr Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume (2014-04-01)The Essence of Liberty: Volume III: A Universal Philosophy of Political Economy (Liberty: A Universal Political Ethic) (Volume 3) Read More

Posted in Song for the Day, Uncategorized | 1 Comment